ForJimmy

Seriously and if these cases stick are we really going to buy/wear a Watson jersey as fans? What kind of message would that send to victims of sexual assault. Unless something groundbreaking happens to expose (no pun intended) this lawyer and his cases we really need to move on.

Unless some major news happens to drop these charges I don’t see it. If these women were assaulted I hope they get their peace and Watson pays the price. As for us, on to plan B. Trade up for Fields or Lance.

If all of this is true and this lawyer asked for $100,000 or whatever it was to settle. You would this he wouldn’t think twice to throw money at this issue? This is all very strange...

I’m not a fan, plus his age/what we would give up to get him. Didn’t want Stafford for similar reasons. Rather take a change on Lance or Fields and have the youth/assets/cheaper contract.

Are 9 actually filed? I’m sure a bunch of people will try to jump on board (not saying they are all making it up), but there will always be people trying to get rich quick. If nine actually get filed and reviewed seriously through the courts he is going to be in some trouble...

No

Does he not have people to schedule his massages and if he is wanting something more surely they can arrange that with someone willing? This whole this is just weird...

That would be a very poor decision on his part. Asking for one is bad enough, giving someone ammunition that can turn into something bigger is a whole other level...

Can you imagine if this all came out after we traded the world for him?

Even better!

If it’s not close to being resolved by draft day, we should just trade up and select Fields or Lance.

If they see him as a sexual predator who is assaulting women he should be cut. I would imagine this kind of thing can make part of his contract voidable. From a PR stand point cutting him (if found guilty) is the right thing to do.

We would have some speed with him and DJax! Jackson and Jackson.

We need some secondary and this defense should be solid!

Does this mean Burns is part of the Watson deal?

20m additional for a better QB. We were already paying around 20 for Teddy if we ditch him we subtract 20m (give or take) plus add 40m for Watson giving us a net increase of 20m which was stated at 10% of our projected salary cap next year.

The constant winners have franchise QBs. Do you need more than just a QB? Yes. Can you consistently complete with QBs like Teddy? Doubtful...

We will more than likely shed Teddy’s $20 million hit next year which would be over 10%. So we are looking at a 10% increase with far superior QB play. We will have money for FAs.

Which team that made a run in the playoffs was doing it with a subpar QB? Packers, Bucs, Chiefs, Bills were the final 4. Saints and Ravens are usually in the mix. It’s not coincidence that the teams who are constantly in the playoffs making runs have franchise QBs. Seahawks usually are and the Steelers. So yeah he was 4-12 last year one year away from a 10-6 season, beating the Bills in the Wild Card round and losing the Mahome led Chiefs.

IF he stays healthy, linebackers could be a strength of ours with Brown keeping linemen off of them.

If we trade CMC we def need to sign Samuel...

Not Chinn.... please!