-
Posts
19,907 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by ForJimmy
-
A good post! You are better when you aren’t trolling!
-
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
Because it’s the extra bit of info needed to try to prove his point no matter how irrelevant it is. They also need to have been drafted on an even year during a leap year. See it’s never happened before therefore it can never happen! -
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
He looked just as bad his first 3 years as several QBs including the great Brett Favre. The Jets franchise trading him has no relevance other than adding one more asterisk so you can exclude him from this list. Had we found someone else you would just add another like “in the last 10 years” or “for a future 2nd.” So plenty of QBs have been where he is at and turned it around. Take your trolling someone else. Honestly I’m not even saying he will turn it around, I’m just annoyed at posters who come on here just to talk down about this team. At least some of the others are actually good at it though and have actual data to back it up. You just tried and failed pretty bad.... -
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
Ahhh so you have no response. Perfect. You wanted some examples I gave you some. Can’t help it if it didn’t line up with your trolling. Ask for data. Receive data. Try to change data. Then give up and mock the other person. Well done! Nice debate. Go study the Appaloosa Model some more, it’s the only thing you know because no one else cares enough about it to fact check you on it. -
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
Must of had a great team because his stats and rating was on par with Sam on year 3. The Golden Calf of Bristol took his team to the playoffs as a starting QB and won on the road on the playoffs. Must be good. Teddy was 5-0 as a Saints starter. Must be good. Taysum Hill has a winning record as a starting QB, so why are they not starting him? Is Sean Payton not smart enough to realize a winning record is what makes a QB good? See wins are the sign of a good TEAM. Troy Aiken also had a losing record after year 3. Started off 1-15, that’s Clausen bad! 19-29 after year 3. Sound have cut his ass right? -
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
He had the luxury of sitting a year and still played just as bad his first 2. First 3 years is what I posted, sorry your comprehension was off, but that doesn’t change the data I provided. Darnold has been injured and missed 10 games over the past 3 years. That’s over half a season. I’m just looking at where these players are at by the end of year 3. -
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
He was actually there briefly! Lol. They traded him to the Saints. Which means they gave up on him. -
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
He has to be a troll from another fan page. Every now and then he will post something half decent to make me question it, but I’m certain he is a bitter Falcons fan or something like that... -
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
Favre only played in 33 games his first 3 seasons so let’s check your math. Sat most of his rookie year and only played in 2 games with barely any snaps. His third season he has 19 TDs and 24 INTs with a 60% completion and 72 rating (I’ll be damned the same rating as Darnold in year 3). Like I was saying these players struggled their first 3 years, the Jets brought in a new staff and wanted to get a new face at 2, so they traded Darnold for draft capital. Let’s be honest the Jets haven’t been the best decision makers lately. https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/112/brett-favre There you go buddy you can read it there without trying to correct people. -
Rattler and Howell are the givens. Watch out for someone to have a Burrow like year, especially with last year being very short for some teams. Malik Davis looks good, JT Daniels was putting it together once he got healthy at the end of the year, Slovis at USC, and Jayden Daniels at ASU all could jump up with a solid year. It’s really not as bad of a class as people are projecting IMO.
-
How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?
ForJimmy replied to SBBlue's topic in Carolina Panthers
Yeah I mean Alex Smith looked like crap his first three years. He really didn’t take off until Harbaugh became the coach and then again with Andy Reid and the Chiefs. The right staff and system can do wonders for a QB. Troy Aikman and Brett Favre had shitty years they’re first 3 as well. The fact is Darnold is only been in the league 3 years, we little help, and terrible coaching. He is still a big question mark at this point who has bad habits of trying to make something out of nothing (like Favre early in his career). -
Hopefully we won’t have to worry about it!
-
I think it will be a more of a let’s get together and pick the guy we want first option. Then make the trade happen not unlike the Niners did this year. For example trading multiple first round picks to get a guy like Howell or Rattler. A guy that checks most/all boxes in which we will give up a large amount of assets to get even if Fitts thinks the price is too high.
-
If Darnold flops, I could definitely see Tepper stepping in.
-
Exactly. Different people have different points of view. The Jets decided Darnold wasn’t the guy and they have professionals that have done this their whole life. Our staff thought differently.
-
Ok? Still isn’t going to talk bad about a player on camera. That just really confirms they don’t think he is just a stop gap QB.
-
Writing off an entire school is not good scouting, but that’s for another debate (after all Burrow was stashed away at OSU for a couple years). Yeah he cost little capital, but they gave him no competition at all this year. They have (maybe too much) confidence in Darnold turning it around. People keep saying we can just try again next year, but no one knows how the draft and our circumstances will look next year. Reddick, Robbie, Moton, plus other players are signed through next year. Players like Howell and Rattler could struggle. I just saw how excited Fitts was about how young Darnold is and immediately compared compared him to players in the draft. That made me think he views him as a potential franchise QB. It could have all been for show knowing the camera was on, who knows?
-
I’m not sure the organization agrees. For one reason they seemed to REALLY like how young he is. If they were just were just wanting a stop gap QB, that really shouldn’t matter. They also had him ranked among the draft’s QB class and passed on two first round talents because they have him. I think the belief is they can make him the guy here. Not saying I agree with it, but that appears (to me at least) to be how they are playing it...
-
Yeah but JuJu didn’t play his last year when he was considered a top pick. I feel like most decent programs will have plays were the WRs save bad throws. It’s looks to me like he didn’t really have any NFL WRs his last year...
-
Who were Sam’s receivers in college that made him appear so great? I don’t recall USC having anyone that great in 2017, but I definitely could be overlooking some players...
-
I think he was implying the bar isn’t high for Darnold to have a career year. His best year’s numbers should be passed easily.
-
Interesting notes from The Athletic Bob McGinn's article
ForJimmy replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
He knows he was proven wrong and is trying hard to pivot to Luke’s career which isn’t even a debate. -
Interesting notes from The Athletic Bob McGinn's article
ForJimmy replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
No one is saying he wasn’t a great HOF MLB. You are pivoting because I showed you scouts didn’t have him as a perfect prospect. I mean it’s a video of Luke himself reading it. So clearly some fans could have listened to similar scouts and been disappointed at the pick when it happened. He turned out to be one of the NFL’s best players, but that’s not what you were debating.