Basbear

side topic- be on notice draft fren, we got to keep up our transitional draft bet and i got to keep up my winning streak!!

I didn't lay the sarcasm on heavy enough, i failed....

I dont know which would have the weakest, but Kafka got KC ties and some of andy reids redwood tree in his phone contacts.. that system is used by dam near all teams (plays at least).

He did a great job with CMC!!1!!

no idea wbout where the thread is, "racism" a guess.....love to see the NFL force some teams to sign white CBs....hell i think CMC could anyway..... Im STILL hung up on this- Ben "im leaving getting fired and had no way to use CMC" Mccadoodo ruined this CMC deal. so they traded the best player cause ben couldnt figure out how to use him and hes gone for 23??? just dumb. The injury deal was sus, he didnt come back cause for the same reasons Horn didnt play in week 18.....no need since no playoffs. Now got a bunch of late round picks for your best player, geeeeeez why would a HC agree to this??

Trust no government.

Welcome back venom!!! Memes aside, one of the main reasons for the twins part was to compare each once the nasa twin returned. Theyve done it since and learned plenty.....one is no matter what you lose bone density. Who knows what type of serums they inject before headed into space now, but one is a must be high doses of HGH, calcium, and K2. Wolfs law could be used in determining a solution too.

Yes, right now I got 4 in the first 8 gone.....like you said its earlier and more can happen......crazy part is Im thinking about putting a 5th into the top 8-10..... Tanner McKee is getting hyped. Plus if you look at the top 8, 5 sorta need QBs......then theres trades and by many accounts bears will be moving the top pick to a QB needy team and they could be out of the top 10. You can not wait until 33 to pick a QB, all the talent/potential for the savior is nearly 0. You got to get in the top 8-10 for sure by my finding. I doubt I change my mind- 4 in the first 8 will be QBs.

Plus by many old media reports, the carolina panthers is listed as the top job............ excuse me

Yea I know its hard to hide. Still if its known a QB is the target, people lose their combined minds about the trade package. My main point is it shouldnt matter, I just what the rights to draft a player and/or feed 200 people.

theres is real smoke about ravens not wanting to pay him top 3 money.....Its possible to tag him this and the next for cheaper.....maybe during work out some trade. The history shows running QBs have much less careers.

I just started my draft stuff........If you want a QB the only shot is using the 9th. Plus right now I dont have AR even making it to the 9th, different year and I feel teams will reach hard for QBs this year. Theres not a good "cream" group of WR, LT, CB, and Edge to knock down the top 4-5 QBs.......might as well take a risk on QB if no blue chips on the table.....

I still want to keep Zane, but I was also of the opinion to leave eddie in atl. I normally keep my cool, but honestly Im still heated about that game........hell Im still heated about michael vicks superman TD as well....... If there are some issues with Zanes injury, keep eddie. Big props to steve wilks, he didnt panic and made eddie a team captain for the next atl game.....big baller move that worked out.

I agree and I do member you being one of the few that didnt want Watson before the tiny towel deal.... What i dont get is *IF* I am trading up for your pick, why do i tell you its for a QB??? Its for a player. Sorta like if you call catering service and tell them its for a wedding, the price is 35% more.....so you have to lie in order to avoid the wedding tax. super dumb.... Its my business whom Im drafting....

Need to bump one of the Watson threads, were I said you can not trade a huge haul of picks for QB when you also have multiple holes....think about the OL without stud Icky there...whom would have been one of the picks for Watson.... Called allllll sort of names and look at it now...

That is were I draw the clear line. It can only be trade 3 ones for a QB under a cheap/fair contract *OR* sign him to top five contracts WITHOUT moving draft capital. Both?!?!??!?!!?!?!? get out of here with that BS... 49ers did this for a rookie, mainly cause they have the best roster in the NFL.....alllll thats missing is the QB. Watson and Wilson, who in their right mind thinks this is the way???

bro, we are coming off matt rhule.......is Rich Kotite still alive?? hmmmm

If hes has OC LaFleur in/on the staff plan, that would switch my disapprove to " welllllllllll its a solid combo " *but* I know he would keep Al as DC and thus I fall back to looking back the other names.....but ANY HC that has Lafleur listed as thier OC, about as strong as you can get. hes checks alll the boxes and very young....he may even get some HC calls, watch the cards give him a call.....i bet..

There are three postions Id believe you should EVERY single year use on(barring huge trade packages). First is - DL simple they rotate and have injuries 2nd- WR thats right, I follow what the steelers and GB do for WRs, their vaule 3rd- OL its the hardest group to coach and gain depth.... If you have the 7-8 picks, use 3 resources on DL, WR, and OL. All have value.

Thats correct, a wise HC would already have LaFleurs promise..... Im just shocked he is available and totally get/approve the new HC should hire the OC...... i just want this young high football IQ mind on the panthers staff...

You know whats crazy- unless some wild card teams fire their HCs....according to many old media heads, thee Carolina Panthers is widely viewed as the best job........ If Shane doesnt want the best current head coaching job, his big lost and it looks rather bad/odd.