SmittysLawnGuy

Unless he is Ben Rothlisraper,  how is Mike Green not a top 10 lock? 17 sacks, 100% effort on every play, great measurables. Marshall be damned. You think that guy wouldn't have more than 4 1/2 sacks in 3 years at A&M? Panthers, please stop just looking at the panty parade and look for some production! 

Anyway, the Tet haters should be thrilled with this 40 time. As a Tet believer, I at least believe it should put him in play at 8 for us as another option if our guys are gone. That 40 puts him in play at 4.

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just trying to help. LOL

Thanks but I fully am aware of the difference. It is a bit embarrassing that I was paying so little attention but there are more egregious examples of poor grammar on this board than a few missed homophones for you to chase down.

They're doing their best to get there. 

Did I pass Teach? 

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Eat my shorts. If I wasn't on a message board at 9am,  I may give a shizz about my grammar.

We are drafting Shemar Stuart. Even if Tet went and ran a 4.2 other teams boards would shift dramatically. Not the Panthers. There done with there board. Hell there guy could break his leg tomorrow. Welp that sucks but our board is set.

The Panthers way baby!

So we have had to resort to buying our own Super Bowl rings to see one our life times. Not a bad idea. Looks great.

That fool was on 10 hours ago. Roppstar. just erase

Between Twitter and sports illustrated there is a lot of Brandon Aiuk talk. Anyone interested. Much rather have Higgins.

1 minute ago, App Panther said:

They play different positions.

What say you? Who has the speed. Who has the run? Could just be you!

1 minute ago, Frank9999 said:

They are just angry about Milton

Moehrig is better than Milton

We had nothing Moehrig is a top 20 safety. Why the hate?

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Evero owned the 32nd ranked D last year and is sitting in the first to go chair for when this team needs to sacrifice someone.   I'm sure he has input.  I would wager he doesn't have a lot of influence present day. 

Not his fault he got no draft picks. Fug you!

10 hours ago, shaq said:

Let’s talk about it, what’s your reasoning?

Unless your willing to add pics of jugs or man buns, you can forget Juan responding, I'll help you out.

Juan. Here boy!

1 minute ago, Stingray3030 said:

BPA is not a reasonable approach on its own.  BPA of your top 5 needs is much more realistic.  IF an elite prospect is there at #8 that fits BPA of our top 5 needs (EDGE, DL, S, CB, LB or TE) then I am all for staying - otherwise trade back to the teens.  Looking at picks values it is absolutely realistic to trade down to 12-18 and pick up 40-50 in compensation.  You do that and walk out of the first 2 rounds with an EDGE, DL, and S and we are in the playoffs next year.

Do a couple of realistic trade back options in the simulators. You always end up happier than sticking and picking.  Not to mention you usually end up still with the guy you wanted. We're just in a bad spot.

I know we have 28m cap. Anyone have a clue where it will end up with cuts and realistic restructures?

I didn't mention Will Johnson but damn I hate not knowing his speed.

We need almost any trade back. (Even in a slight loss) All of our guys will be gone. Graham, Carter, Hunter. It's a crap shoot after that, Id say Pierce but he's an ahole. Green, but that's probably the color of his member. Walker, T rex that can't workout. Tet hides cause he's slow. Stewart, 1 sack per year. If we can't trade back uggh! At that point I'd take either of these 4. And forget your Kiper boards Give me Walter Nolan (DT), Nick Emanwari?(safety from S.C.), Tyler Warren (TE) or Matthew Golden (WR) Mykel Williams ehh. I give up. It's just us, every pick above us is valuable. We fall into the next 20 guys. It only hurts a lot. Mommy!

20 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Can't see Morgan taking him either he loves measurables 

Why would we take a future hall of famer when we can take Shemar Stewartt with 1 sack per year but the potential to be King Kong. Ked Woodley music fades out. And the Panthers recruiters go dupe da dupe dupe due da da dupe da dupe.

3 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Again, he's not NOT running the 40, he's just not doing it at the combine, which has more or less been standard practice for most Top 10-15 picks over the last decade or so.

If he was trying to not run, he wouldn't be doing the drills at the Big 12 combine and/or pro day, he'd say he has a tweaked ankle or something to avoid running a slow time.

Lol. Watch Mc Shay on his post combine youtube not that he knows all. He literally 2 hours after the Lawn Guy said it, a healthy scratch by Tmac makes Golden my #1. Lawn Guy for GM! 

15 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

 

 

32 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Nope, which is why it’s a negative to run only at a pro day. Our own Damiere Byrd ran a 4.28 at his pro day. Funchess ran a 4.7 at the combine and then a 4.5 at Michigan’s pro day. Add 0.2 to any pro day run.

If McMillan was truly fast, he’d run at the combine. Even a 4.5 would have been solid at his size.

 

Took the Nope as you disagreeing with him and then proving his point. Should have started with Exactly. Some of us drink by crackie!

Wait I'm still right how is it a negative to only run at your pro day when it's always faster. Mrs. McMillan will be holding the stop watch. Running at the combine shows the truth vs. BS.

15 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Nope, which is why it’s a negative to run only at a pro day. Our own Damiere Byrd ran a 4.28 at his pro day. Funchess ran a 4.7 at the combine and then a 4.5 at Michigan’s pro day. Add 0.2 to any pro day run.

If McMillan was truly fast, he’d run at the combine. Even a 4.5 would have been solid at his size.

6 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

And Pro-day 40 times are always faster. Not the same clock set up.

Exactly, don't trust those one bit!

10 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

They mark they were looking for was 4.4 sec 40 which is the benchmark for the nfl

 

5'10 164 vs 6'5 220 are not graded for equal speed.

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

They mark they were looking for was 4.4 sec 40 which is the benchmark for the nfl.

He gets an extra .1 for that size and range.

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Again, he's not NOT running the 40, he's just not doing it at the combine, which has more or less been standard practice for most Top 10-15 picks over the last decade or so.

If he was trying to not run, he wouldn't be doing the drills at the Big 12 combine and/or pro day, he'd say he has a tweaked ankle or something to avoid running a slow time.

Don't get me wrong. I'd love him to run a 4.45. I heard you mention his top end tracker a few times. Question is how long to get there?