Jump to content

CRA

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    66,961

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by CRA

  1. CRA
    I am a simple man. You have to prove yourself in order to get assumptions your unknown ways are good. DG has no resume as a GM and I didn't like some comments he made and ignoring glaring holes....ones that revolve around the QB. Too many IMO think DG is great despite him not doing that much. His record overall to date has never shown much faith in this QB/HC... and I didn't want a doomed season. Goes back to JR though....he keeps creating these scenarios
  2. CRA
    You think he wants to eliminate himself that quick? Bc if a FO didn't want it out.....one candidate would quickly remove himself from consideration
  3. CRA
    I don't buy that... All I buy is Richardson forced RR/Cam on him for one year.....and then he can move in his own direction. Why his real investment was on a DG defense. DG IMO could have helped RR by fixing some glaring issue on his OL. Had the ability to upgrade and didn't.
  4. CRA
    RR knows it is playoffs or bust. Doesn't need his seat hotter. IMO, this is a FO showing lack of faith in everyone when our season is very much still alive In all honesty, RR is gone even with a playoff appearance. Would have to win in the postseason likely
  5. CRA
    Gettlemen has never been a GM before.... He is an old rookie GM. The same week they trade away a veteran presence his FO leaks this? On our way to a HUGE road game? Sounds dumb to me...
  6. CRA
    There D and ST would have to be part of those points. Either scoring themselves or putting the O in automatic pt scenarios. Which could happen
  7. CRA
    I can get picking them.... That struggling O to put up the most points on us this season.....not so much.
  8. CRA
    Also, the Cardinals D while it has played very good......is getting back there best defensive player and a starting NT that was out.
  9. CRA
    You said those impressive defensive numbers translated to us winning handily. Winning handily in the NFL IMO is a beatdown.....you don't loke the wording fine. There stats don't translate to our offense rolling to an easy win.....which you brought up Those were your numbers that indicated a handily beating....now you are claiming they mean nothing and points is all that should be looked at when it was pointed out how good those numbers really were. But I agree points matter, yards don't. The fact there offense has been a joke actually means there D likely is even better than it is on paper. And I said this will be a field position game.....who wins that will get the points. Neither team should be rolling offensively IMO. We have a better offense. Which helped our D. Too early to claim we are better defensively.....AZ is talented and proven it on D
  10. CRA
    Cam definitely needs to run....hopefully Shula sees getting away from that to fit some Gettlemen dream isn't the way. Cam should have a designed run on the first series of every game. He just seems to get in a comfort zone when he is doing it. Gross spoke on this before last year.
  11. CRA
    This. Whichever D sets up there offense the best should win....and AZ has a D
  12. CRA
    Wildcard Shula
  13. CRA
    Win handily based on what they are giving up? That doesn't jive. That is the 2nd best in in ypr allowed in the NFL and a respectable 13th in ypp. that is good D...not an indicator of a beatdown. Field position and turnovers will be huge this week IMO
  14. CRA
    The Giants, yeah... The rest, we didn't really impact there rankings I think we can run enough to keep the play action respected.....which is what we have done in competitive games this year
  15. CRA
    Yep, they are a big part iof why there opponents don't rank well in the rush rankings despite good rush games against other teams. We also have played some weaker rush D's which aids our rankings. A Seattle type gameplan IMO wins it. If the D shows up. We don't want to give there DBs too many shots to make plays IMO
  16. CRA
    If AZ hasn't proven to have a good rush D.....we haven't proven to have a good rush attack. I see our rush getting bottled up or contained. Running for the sake of running to keep the play action respected IMO. Defense IMO will need to win this game. AZ likely saying the same. Tougher game IMO than most are expecting
  17. CRA
    Panthers also have faced the 27th, 28th and 18th rush defenses. like most weeks, we go in confident or worried about something and it gets flipped on its head. This would be a potential area to watch for.
  18. CRA
    They have some playmakers in the secondary.....I think we need a somewhat conservative offense approach unless forced to open it up. Can't allow there one strength to have a big impact.
  19. CRA
    He won't remain the featured guy when people get healthy.....that defies logic. It will be a committee
  20. CRA
    I said we need to use all RBs when healthy.....YOU are the one breaking down what I think the split should be....not me. How does it work. Cam needs his.... Tolbert get his short yardage. That leaves 3 sharing work in between the 20s. No one should get tons of work. Barner needs to be sprinkled in. So does Stewart. As will Williams. And as of right now, other backfields are producing better than our backfield. When we get healthy we can be better. Cam always makes them look better on a stat sheet (like the #2 rush attack). HOU for example, there RBs 3 weeks in are much more productive.....but people will claim Carolina's RBs are running better. When we have Williams, Stewart, Barner and Tolbert..... And Cam. We can be overall great. We are effective right now. We can be better..
  21. CRA
    Yeah, um....that is just false. Williams was our only option in-between the 20s....so yeah, he gets the work. He has run well doing what he does And yeah, our ground attack has been okay. Nothing special. It has been consistent....which is good. If we get healthy it should get better
  22. CRA
    Tolbert won't be effected....he is going to get his goal work and short yardage. Williams is not Frank Gore. Gore is better What act? Saying we need to use all are RBs when they are healthy? LOL. We will need to....they all bring something different
  23. CRA
    Williams is running well.....he isn't doing 2008 type junk. To say other RBs shouldn't see the field when healthy is silly. Especially ones that have different roles/abilities. Problem with the DWill fan club....is they take matter of fact comments as DWill hate
  24. CRA
    B/c you can get better than what we are.....why settle for okay.
  25. CRA
    Well we need to give Williams, Barner, Tolbert and Stewart work when they return....and Cam needs to continue to run more. Best rushing on Sunday wasnt DWill it was Newton. Hopefully Barner can start doing a little something soon....I think once he starts getting on the field people will see there is a difference in burst and explosiveness
×
×
  • Create New...