Jump to content

Mother Grabber

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    22,240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mother Grabber

  1. i’m sure he’d love to play for the Durham Bulls
  2. this is 100% irrelevant, but hey if you want to go there…total team defense rankings as per the NCAA: Iowa - 2 Illinois - 3 Michigan - 6 Minnesota - 9 Georgia - 10 Wisconsin - 11 Alabama - 13
  3. i didn’t know i was trying to convince you of something. if that’s the case, then look at the last sentence of what i wrote.
  4. Lawrence Taylor played at 245 and ran 4.6…and broke people’s legs.
  5. i wonder how many people will be saying it’s Young after his pro day, though it’s hard to show off his ability to read a defense without a defense.
  6. there’s a sizable portion of the fan base who thinks there’s a minimum threshold of size to have a long and successful career as a QB in the NFL.
  7. some people just can’t be happy unless they’re bitching
  8. houston doesn’t know who we’re going to take, only that we could take more than one. if they want one guy and one guy only, it would be worth it to them to guarantee that guy.
  9. next years first is possible, especially if they think we’re taking their guy.
  10. we’re going to dominate dem foes
  11. i’d be shocked if we take Young. the move to 1 has to be for Stroud.
  12. we hope Frank can turn Corral into a solid QB that we keep as long as we can, or trade to some QB needy team for a bucket of picks.
  13. D and WR can be picked up in free agency. Franchise QBs can’t. You need to draft one and hold onto it like your favorite stuffed animal when you were 2.
  14. from one of the 18 other threads on this topic… it just seems that the only reason to go to 1 is for stroud. Levi’s will be there at 3. If they think Stroud is dat dude, then gitter dunn and lets fuggin go. if they take Levi’s at 1, then i expect it’s because the trade packages for 1 and 3 were similar, or even that Chicago wanted less. moving back to 2 and taking Levi’s there, while picking back up next years 1 would be a 4D chess move.
  15. it just seems that the only reason to go to 1 is for stroud. Levi’s will be there at 3. If they think Stroud is dat dude, then gitter dunn and lets fuggin go. if they take Levi’s at 1, then i expect it’s because the trade packages for 1 and 3 were similar, or even that Chicago wanted less. moving back to 2 and taking Levi’s there, while picking back up next years 1 would be a 4D chess move.
  16. heck of a first post, welcome to teh Huddlez @Zod
×
×
  • Create New...