kungfoodude

This is actually a tough one. Darnold needs as many live reps as possible to hopefully build his confidence up. On the other hand, this will be the longest regular season in NFL history and Darnold has never successfully completed an NFL season in his career due to injury or illness. Not to mention, it's highly likely he is going to be taking a fuging shelling behind that OL we have assembled currently. I guess we may as well play him a lot in the preseason. If he gets injured behind that line, it was likely bound to happen anyway. At least if he goes down in the first half of the season we might have enough info to decide to move on or keep him. With PJ Walker and Will Grier backing him up, we can be in prime position to draft an actual franchise QB again.

L O L Make it in a real game, bruh.

Yo, if you don't like talk about glistening loins and ample chests, then you can get fuged.

It's the preseason. You have to lower your general expectations. Vanilla schemes and lots of backups playing.

I always liked Peyton. Genuinely funny dude. He didn't have much of a part in our 2015 loss other than physically showing up.

Didn't even go far enough to speculate on that. Just throwing out a theoretical scenario in which it would be acceptable to make that kind of trade. Unless you are getting a quality LT starter, zero reason to be trading away a first for a middling LT. Especially for a team that needs those draft picks as desperately as ours.

The team is not even close to good enough. The only circumstance in which we are trading a 1st for a left tackle should be one that is our starter for the foreseeable future. And, in that scenario, one first may not be enough to get it done.

I believe you mean "don't."

Even if Darnold looked like trash in the preseason, it doesn't mean that much. The only thing that matters is when the bullets are real, that is when we are going to find out what we have.

He had worked out a bunch of places that didn't sign him. Something clearly has to be up with him. Either a drastic loss of abilities or an undisclosed injury or something.

Okay. Still should be a fairly sizeable amount, I would assume.

Since it is an all included in a charity auction, I am not sure if that is the case or not.

With those bust players, people are always going to keep seeing potential, no matter what. Hell, we have a large chunk of people buying into a very obvious bust QB that we traded for based on that potential. So, I do understand how it can be enticing. This is a different scenario, however. Watson's abilities are completely unquestioned, it just boils down to whether he is going to be possible to sign for a while. If things go poorly, I would suspect we see a Mike Vick type situation, where he is out of the league for a bit and then eventually comes back "rehabilitated."

Me $0 but I also don't really need that $120k tax write off like that guy probably ultimately does.

Yeah, I would think that we should have all learned by now that trial by public opinion or certainly by media doesn't mean a lot. From a PR standpoint, perhaps so, which is a genuine issue that has to be considered in a league that has public perception to worry about. Even the resolution of a civil and/or criminal case is no guarantee that we actually would know any of the real facts. Just that the theatrics are completed and we have an ultimate result.

Yeah, I mean that much is pretty obvious, I would think. I understand the "buy low" crowd thinks now might be the time to strike but there isn't a team in the NFL that is going to make a deal for him until the entire ordeal is sorted out or at least behind the scenes there are some assurances about the result and the NFL's plan for him.

Only A. would actually stop him. I would guarantee that even if we drafted some young stud QB in 2022, there would be at least a couple of posters still talking about how we should have gotten Watson instead. The Huddle will always do with it does best.....Huddle.

I really have no idea why people are debating the finer points of the allegations/charges/etc. That stuff is going to sort itself out and we will eventually see what the result is. Unless someone here knows any of these details personally or is somehow connected to these proceedings, it's kind of ridiculous to even speculate. I can understand breaking down someone's specific point of view by the "did he or didn't he" end result but I really can't understand the need to play the case out in a message board of people who literally have next to no idea what transpired.

No matter where he ends up, there will at least be a portion of people here that won't ever let us forget about how we should have traded for him. Especially if he is still dominant. I would think your years of Huddle experience would have made this situation obvious.

You really think that would stop it??

If you put on the tape of him versus NC State from last season, you will start wondering about that hype train. Not saying the kid isn't talented but he definitely didn't look good in that game. He had a lot of success rushing the ball against Coastal Carolina but his passing was a little suspect. Definitely a guy to keep an eye on to see if he improves a lot as a passer but there is no way I would rate him as a first round draft pick at the moment.

I think they just simply went BPA. It just happened to suck for us. I will be curious to see how Goff fares there.

We have to see if they are even a cohesive unit at all. That isn't going to be super obvious for probably a quarter of a season or so(unless they are just really good or really bad immediately). TC is tough to get a great read on the OL overall. On paper we should be as bad or worse than last year. But, we got a full season to figure out the reality.

The Lions making our starting LT a fuging RT makes me so fuging upset every time I see it mentioned. It would be so much easier to swallow if they needed a LT but they fuging didn't even need one. fug them.