kungfoodude

Another offseason, another list of UDFA's that the Huddle gets way too excited over.

As a 5th rounder, that's about all you can ask.

Hurney-esque

Results matter. I like the direction we appear to be headed but until we get there, he has been an extremely unsuccessful owner.

You don't trade up to get a mid round QB in one of the worst QB classes in recent memory. That's just stupid. It shouldn't be a shock to anyone if we move on, nor if he never plays any meaningful snaps in the NFL.

Hated to see the run on Edge players at the end. Was looking forward to having some options. WR pool is thinned out for sure. Will be interesting to see what we do. I suspect a trade down is likely.

Yeah, I don't think we will see many(if any) from that group still here in three years.

He was a bad pick anyway. That much was fairly obvious at the time.

I don't think there will be many takers.

I think there is only so far being a charlatan can carry you. Notice that his trend prior to his firing here was short stints at each spot. Always staying a step ahead of anyone figuring him completely out.

Hindsight is going to be even more unkind to the Rhule Era, I predict. Lots more lips will eventually talk about how poorly suited to the NFL he was. I also predict he will flop at Nebraska.

I think the keeping the press on a leash was so less eyes could see the obvious sham in progress.

I very much prefer Young but this source.....I mean.....

Even the founders quote in the article says his own product is not a reason to take a player as a standalone measure. Basically just another evaluation tool.

Team doctor??

@TheBigKat If you venture off the beaten path, hit LC's for burnt ends. Open the windows and you will smell it about a mile out. Cabinet smoker probably older than my grandfather.

IDC unless you let me know which BBQ place you will go. That let's me know if you are serious.

I hate you but that is objectively funny.

I am sure it ends up being a tool that largely confirms what is seen on film or shows something they can go back to the film to take a closer look at. TBH, most of these metrics end up being that anyway. It's just putting a number to what you should be able to see by watching film.

It's not really. These teams all have access to the real information, so they are probably just chuckling at all the fake social media outrage by people who don't have a clue.

Fair point but getting hundreds of thousands of NFL QB's would take several hundred years, so you have to keep in mind the data pool is always going to be relatively small in that regard. Without being able to peek behind the curtain and see everything, it's hard to make too much of a positive or negative judgment. However, a lot of this is certainly successful marketing by this company.

In fairness, this has existed for 8 straight NFL drafts and has been used by the NFL. For whatever reason this just because a hot issue this NFL draft cycle. My guess is that they have a large enough pool of players to make this a decent tool. It should get better with time.

Pretty sure that the S2 isn't a single score anyway. That was what one of the founder's was saying on a recent The Roar podcast. It's a set of scores in different areas of performance.

Yeah, between us and the Texans, he has no real reason to even meet with any of the other teams.