kungfoodude

Bradford and Pennington would have passed 2nd round criteria. The 1st round criteria is a little higher and career longevity isn't factored. Years started is, because as a 1st round draft pick, the expectation is that you will be a starter and likely for a long time. But you can see why I shied away from using statistical means. You can end up cutting some objectively amazing players like Steve McNair or Cam Newton. Or even someone like Eli Manning. That's why I stayed with award/accolade or length of starting career or career. The logic being that if your peers(HOF), the fans/peers(Pro Bowl) or the media(All Pro) regarded you as one of the best, that accounts for a lot. It's taking a wide swath of largely well regarded opinions about a player's performance. In a manner of speaking so does career and starting length. That is the greater NFL(FO, coaching staffs, etc) saying that you are a valuable addition to the organization in some capacity(starter or backup). Statistics are tough because they ignore changes in the game and the vast differences in individual QB's. Cam was never a high completion percentage guy but he dominated many of the games he started. He changed the way people played us. TD:INT ratio seems like a decent enough marker but it eliminates gunslingers and especially old school style gunslingers. Guys that might have had MVP caliber performances(McNair) couldn't meet that criteria. It would probably be equally difficult to screen players by career winning percentage, QB rating, etc. Using individual statistical means to measure a career is really fuging hard. Doesn't mean I can't use them but I need input because a lot of the things I have attempted just didn't have great results in what I would say are "successful" careers. And my methodology isn't perfect. Certainly there are strong arguments against some of them people that met my criteria. Largely the Pro Bowl. I suppose I could increase that to 2+.

Danielle Snyder.

This is a shoulder shrug move. Shouldn't be met with either deep skepticism nor fanfare. It's depth.

Our LB's are bottom 3 in the NFL. They correctly analyzed that. That's what a good coaching staff does.

That is even better. A moment that will go down in Panthers lore. What a guy.

I am not sure if you are aware but it did take Jay Z seven years to make it. Jus' sayin'.

Well 12.5 is definitely going to push some action on the Panthers. 7.5 would cause all the money to be on GB.

It does happen. People are very spoiled by the recent spate of late 30's and early 40's effective QB's.

I don't think he is washed but he is a guy that can probably only fit in selected areas. He's always been a fairly limited player in some regards. I am sure given injuries there would be ample interest for him, however.

He has very poor chemistry with Bryce. Bryce has been throwing him a lot of 50/50 balls that AT would routinely make but that is not Renfrow's game at all, so he hasn't been successful. Ironically, Renfrow does occasionally get open only to have Bryce throw elsewhere or miss the read. Glad to have Renfrow as a decent 5th or 6th option but there is no reason not to keep playing Horn(adds a completely different element to the offense as a gadget player), Tremayne(physically large target and great run blocker) and Coker(does most of what Renfrow does but far larger and better as a run blocker). If it were me personally, I'd probably put him ahead of XL on the WR depth chart but I completely understand why that doesn't happen.

He seems like a players coach to a fault. Just wants everyone to like him.

I would heavily disagree. Canales inability to take advantage of the 31st ranked rush defense was solely his doing. Andy definitely aided heavily in that loss but the utter lack of in game adjustments and the refusal to use offensively personnel in an logical manner is his own doing.

I personally see more Hopkins than Evans but if he gets close to either, I will be very happy.

I was going to say his ceiling is Hopkins. That's the style of WR he is.

Plus the XL thing, Corbett over Mays, etc. He just doesn't want to play his best guys where they fit best. We are not merit based. At all.

This is the way I view it completely. He. Stinks.

Wharton is playing out of position. Evero is a lightspeed idiot, IMO.

I honestly think a far better QB would just end up exposing Canales much more significantly.

I would probably attribute something closer to 70% of the problems with DC and his playcalling.

I think we got blown off the map because of Canales. I think that game could have been a lot more competitive.

I don't think we are a good enough roster to rush that. If there is a true answer available and the price makes sense, sure. But sure answers at QB are rarely ever available in the NFL.

I am not arguing the talent disparity. This is still the 2nd worst roster in franchise history, only behind the 2024 roster. But DC is consistently a problem.

I agree we are starting off from a lower point than Ron, by a wide margin. But all too often DC is one of the top few reasons we are losing these games. I am not seeing much in the way of adapting.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQU8kRRAdLd/?igsh=Nml1MjVtdDF4Nnlw Still here somehow.

I am fine drafting a QB but we do need to be realistic about this upcoming draft class. More than likely, a great/good QB option may not be available at our pick. It's looking like an extremely weak QB class. It might be a better idea to make that move late, as this class does seem to be heavy with guys with attributes but a lot of warts. I would hate to miss out on a valuable contributor and potentially core member on another QB reach. Play the board. BPA. Get better as an overall team.