kungfoodude

Someone is snitching on themselves. The man publicly states he doesn't know why he is losing and Tepper still has him employed. Pretty sure we all know who the biggest clown in the organization is.

I mean, I did but that would ruin the joke.

I didn't even look at them.

Two of these three is smart. 66.7% chance we don't fug this up.

I'm down. Let's get a LT.

I'm in a weird spot here because I actually agree with him.

He is just used to being a Panthers fan so he is accustomed to fuging up.

I mean, did he embarrass himself or become an instant legend?

Yeah, I think the odds of them taking a QB are slim. They don't need an OT and they may not want to take the remaining DE's at 2.

Just in time for @Zod to get a chance to gaze at the new Panthers wieners. @TheSpecialJuan will be expecting that report.

Okay. I guess you just didn't read them. Either way.

This should apply to the regular season, as well.

Yeah, I mean you can feel free to pick and choose what you decide to read from what I posted. Free country. I would suggest actually opening the articles you post before you post them in the future, however.

I am a consistent PFF defender but they aren't doing science more "sciencey." Remember their metrics are based on human judges. The way they determine "catchable" and "uncatchable" is also likely to be imperfect. It's a good stat but you sort of tried to put out articles that backed up this stat as a predictor of success that were just bad articles(mostly due to time since they had been posted and being proved wrong). The stats themselves I have not a lot of issue with. I generally agree that accuracy is one of the more solid predictors of NFL success. But it doesn't really require digging that far into it, simple completion percentage is an accurate enough predictor. I think they are likely a decent trend with a fairly wide margin for error. Interesting to see, regardless.

Pretty sure he has been Randy for the past few years.

Better arm but similar ceiling.

Yeah, I think that's draftniks saying that. I think they more down because he didn't "progress." His mechanics are gonna get him in trouble in the NFL.

That has been classic recent Panthers, completely ignore the strengths of a draft on draft day.

TBH, Simms is a far better judge of accuracy than PFF. I like PFF just fine but they aren't going to understand or easily be able to deduce things like ball placement, timing, throwing mechanics, etc. Simms can much more easily deduce who is going to be an accurate thrower just because he has an extremely well trained eye. He's done it for decades. He's from a family that has done it. Not to say PFF doesn't have value but when it comes to prospect evaluation, Simms is WAAAAAAY more qualified to make an evaluation than just taking a PFF stat. That really shouldn't be a controversial opinion for that matter. PFF is good at some things but prospect evaluation they are pretty awful at. You can't solely break down college prospects purely statistically. It doesn't work.

Well that first article is really cringe worthy considering how terribly it aged. That definitely doesn't even stand up to the limited amount of time it has been since it was written. The second snippet also doesn't look that great when you loom at their rookie seasons. I understand what you are probably trying to say, and I don't necessarily completely disagree but those articles are pretty bad.

Herbert was fairly accurate, he did have one subpar year. Lance was hard to quantify because he only played one season. Had he played another year with similar results(almost 67% completion percentage), I think those concerns would have been less. I think Willis will predominately take advantage of this just being a weak class overall more than anything. If you are gonna miss, why not miss on a guy with his kind of skillset?

How much money and how long a time period?

On average, accuracy is one of the traits that translates the best to the NFL.

Scouts aren't down on his production, they are down on his tape.