kungfoodude

Wallace should really predominantly be a special teams 2nd or 3rd string LB to develop for a while. He is really quite bad. Not Rozebum bad but not much better. I don't blame Wallace. He was always going to be a project player and he was forced into action far, far, FAR too early and the continued reliance on him is criminal roster building at ILB. Eventually, just like at starting center, you have to try to improve the position through the draft. We keep passing on Pro Bowl/All Pro caliber LB's outside the 1st round in draft after draft(sound familiar?). This cannot continue.

Aside from TheSmallKat's cringey, insane post, I think the game next Sunday is about who is prepared to poo their pants harder. Currently, Tampa has reached 1-7 in their last 8 games pants shitting, including losses to Miami, Atlanta, New Orleans and us. They are also 3-4 at home. So, basically blown out of diaper up the back and into the hair level pants shitting. For us, our pants shitting has been at a 4-4 record over the last 8 games, including losses to the Saints twice. We are 3-5 on the road this season. So, we have filled the diaper with some mild leakage.

Cherelus is definitely better than Wallace but that's a pretty low bar. I honestly think that Evero just has absolutely zero idea what a good starting ILB looks like. Or an EDGE for that matter.

He is legitimately just a special teams player. If Evero had no use for Jeremy Chinn then he definitely has no use for Simmons. You can certainly argue it is a bit mind boggling for him to be worse than Wallace and Rosebum but it is possible.

Who can afford 10 All Pro's on a single side of the ball?

I think there have been plenty of us ready to move on from Canales. He is far too inexperienced as both an offensive coordinator and a head coach. He is genuinely one of the worst in game coaches we have had in the Tepper era.

Sadly, I think the problem is both. The biggest issue is that he is a very, very low football IQ player and he isn't a 20 or 21 year old. What sense does it make to keep him around for 4-5 more years while he learns the position?

I firmly believe this is not a great scheme for him.

IDK about that but what we are doing overall defensively is causing him to perform less than his capability, IMO.

I know people have been sucking Horn's dick all season long but he is genuinely near career low levels in almost everything but INT's.

He has literally been consistently bad.

Yes but what do you consider "current?"

I think plenty of us have been highlighting how bad he is as a playcaller for some tike now. Ain't nothing changed

Okay, I think that's more so an opinion based on the results you want. Not invalid but I do think the league's goals were ultimately achieved.

Now in terms of? What is "now?"

Bryce is fuging trash.

See above post. I would disagree based on scoring and actual passing yardage. The intent was more passing and more offense and it did work.

That's not a very Christmasy spirit. Norovirus is the gift that keeps on giving.

I knew you were still a secret Pats fan.

I don't really agree. These eras have also featured the most average passing yardage in NFL history.

It's not impossible but not probable. I do think Top 5 All Time is fairly assured. One thing to consider is that he has been far more productive this deep in his career than most RB's. If he doesn't hit the cliff and has a AP or Frank Gore-ish length of career, it is possible he takes it.

Keys To The Game 1. Establish the run early and often. 2. Keep JSN in check. 3. Put pressure on Darnold, he will wilt. Most Important Winning Factor: Have @TheBigKat make a large bet against the Panthers accompanied by a cringey post. This is crucial.

There is a not absurd path to Henry ending up the all time NFL rusher.

High risk passing offenses has become anathema to the modern NFL doctrine. That is why TO prone gunslingers are out of fashion in a big way.

I would generally disagree. I like Evans potential, Tremble is a blocking JAG and Sanders is terrible.