kungfoodude

They keep closing out hard on the PP, hoping to catch them but not getting crisp passes down low.

Says the guy that has zero idea what the technology he is "using" is even good at or how it works.

I mean, the fact that we seem to always have "one of those games" with Freddie in net tells me a lot. Remember when this was happening with Mikko's big, dumb ass on the team? IMO, the team doesn't believe in him and it impacts their play.

Yeah, I do because I literally actually understand how a LLM works, especially in relation to a fuging search engine. You very clearly don't, which isn't even remotely surprising. Let me guess, you are one of the people that talks to Grok or ChatGPT or whatever AI tool that you have no clue how to use properly all day, aren't you?

You do realize that it's very often completely fuging wrong because it parses the top few Google selected results that might differ, be from completely ridiculous sources or just flat out be wrong, right? Learn technology, dipshit.

Whelp, another PP whiffed on.

We gotta get goals in the net. Freddie is going to allow a lot of scores, it's just what he does. Offense cannot go cold.

Buddy, I went through all 32 rosters, looked at production in 2025(hence why your assertion of who was or wasn't starters on the 49ers is laughable), looked at the NFL's official combine site and if they didn't run at the combine found at least 2-3 sources for each "Pro Day" and if that wasn't available I checked recruiting sites for HS 40 times. How about you don't be a lazy fug and go look them up yourself instead of asking AI. That basically tells me you have zero idea what you are talking about. You even admit it.

I quite literally did not use AI, I hate that poo. LLM's are for nitwits who can't search. You have zero idea what you are talking about.

That felt like watching us on the PP.

Delay of game??? WTF. How is that intentional?

Ask him to call Jerry. I'll take that bloated contract minus the prorated bonus money. He would be $40 mil, $45 mil and $55 mil and after 2026, none of that money is guaranteed. Dak at $40 mil for one year is actually a steal. Plus they would immediately incur a $130 mil dead cap hit. Triple win.

They have that goon Gudas. Plus, it's about the only shot they have of slowing us down.

I mean in the first two games back he takes a hard hit on the goal. This poo is crazy.

I mean, I gave you the available numbers, you can choose to believe them or not. I can also tell you that TMac is actually a 4.2 guy but it doesn't make it any more true.

Did the spirit of Cam Skattebo inhabit Jarvy's body? What in the sweet fug.

IMO, we do need to make a trade. It's not sustainable and Freddie is completely washed. You can see it, he doesn't move as well as he used to, IMO. I think the start was last year and he has continued to decline.

Who the fug is on Twitter anymore? What a sewer.

Yeah, I mean we all know they are stupid. They have proven that for the last 8+ years.

@Stumpy You got a Wet Ass Bussi meme for me?

Not sure how much sense that makes because it would require trading draft capital to obtain him. Sam Howell, who is a younger and slightly less productive player but essentially the same guy is a free agent. Just bring him in. I will say these guys are basically Hail Mary 3rd QB options, ideally.

I have a group of friends that will be attending. It's surprising how many people believe that only members can attend these tailgates.

Only people in our fanbase consider him starting caliber. Ask any other NFL, non-casual fanbase and they will laugh when you ask the question about how good they think he is. It's no different than the Matt Moore stans, the Weinke stans, the Pickles stans, the Kyle Allen stans, the Darnold stans, the PJ Walker stans, etc, etc, etc, etc. You just end up with a portion of the fanbase that is irrational and illogical.

Sunk cost fallacy is holding onto assets in the hope of recovering a return, rather than taking your losses and reinvesting them into something that may pay off. This is the exact opposite of sunk cost fallacy by keeping a failed asset.him be a second stringer for a year. ———— You he think he is a fallacy. You aren’t alone. I am a minority probably. I could say it differently. We have something invested in him, unless he is a locker room issue or bad teammate I am not calling him completely sunk. I would let him be a backup and let it play out some more and just see where everything goes. He has had good days and Dalton played he seems to be able to make it work, I just wouldn’t make that move right now. Demoted is fine, no argument. I don't think you are understanding what I am saying. You said he is "sunk cost" which is a reference to the sunk cost fallacy. The investment has been made and gained little to no return. Cutting our losses now(future draft capital and/or roster spots) is the prudent course of action. Having a bad backup WR serves no value.

I think Murray will not be short of opportunities if he gets released. If Justin Fields had so many suitors after how bad he was, Murray will get plenty. I think he is likely to go for a price that doesn't make a lot of sense unless we deem him THE QB, which I don't think I would be interested in. I'd even be wary to have him on a Geno Smith/Baker Mayfield/Sam Darnold level "dollar store" franchise QB price tag/length.