Jump to content

kungfoodude

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    31,674
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kungfoodude

  1. The amount of QB's on that list that Huddlers wanted to attempt to obtain as a Bryce replacement is telling. I sometimes wonder if the only place more inept than the Panthers at evaluation of QB talent is the Carolina Huddle.
  2. It's a plague and it's predictable. STEFAN LAFORS GONNA BE THE REAL DEAL!!! WILL GRIER HAS A STRONGER ARM THAN CAM. GOAT, YOU WATCH!!!! KYLE ALLEN GONNA HAVE US UNDEFEATED!!!! MATT MOORE SHOULD BE OUR FRANCHISE QB!!!!
  3. Dude, this thread is filled with that crap. It's nuts. It's the same BS we get with the Hooker stuff. WeLl I wOuLd StArT hOoKeR oVeR bRyCe Or AnDy!!!!!! No. Just....no.
  4. The interest and discussion is fine, once this turns into "THIS IS THE NEXT FRANCHISE QB HERE TRUSTMEBRO!!!" is when they lose me. He isn't good. At all. He is an upgrade to our existing PS QB, at best. And, no, after 4-5 years as a starter here he isn't going to become Baker Mayfield in his mid-30's.
  5. Literally three of the top 10 overall receivers from this draft so far(guys I really liked pre-draft, BTW) are not 1st round TE's.
  6. In fairness, this is actually "Standard Huddling." This place always loves them some UDFA or PS guys. Never fails. Doesn't matter if less than 1% succeed, Huddle be like....
  7. I mean this is not only demonstrably false, it's laughable. Most of the top NFL TE's over the past decade were not 1st round draft picks.
  8. That's why you gotta be careful about those early takes. Pretty sure there are a lot of dusty ass Kelvin Benjamin jersey's out there.
  9. I don't think you forgo the opportunity to upgrade a position significantly because the team has other issues. That is gonna be the case for several more offseasons as we attempt to build. If you have the opportunity to get a game changing TE, you take them. Now, I do mean largely through the draft. I don't think we should be breaking the bank on a TE in free agency.
  10. I just don't think there is much in the way of ceiling and he's a replacement level player. Not advocating for jettisoning him but if a better player is there in FA or the draft, you take them.
  11. My issue with Tremble is that his career development curve is very Ian Thomas-esque. Doesn't seem to be getting better year after year.
  12. Evans looks promising. The rest of that group is very replaceable. Mitchell might be our second best TE right now, for that matter.
  13. That's his ceiling. He isn't that now. That's the problem.
  14. It netted one potentially elite player, one solid starter and two role players. That's pretty good but that was in 11 shots on goal. It was billed as a franchise changer and it didn't turn out that way. 3 out of the top 4 was still good.
  15. Yeah but that is through the first three weeks of the season. No idea what thoss stats look like now.
  16. No doubt. He is on track for an elite career and maybe a spot in Panthers history.
  17. Eli does have two and his playoff accomplishments are pretty remarkable. But, if you removed those from the equation it isn't a compelling argument at all.
  18. Brady makes Collinsworth seem tolerable. poo, I would pay to have that kind of commentary regularly. It was fantastic.
  19. Romo can still be great but the fuging retarded network basically told him to be dumber. Early Romo was arguably the best of them all. But the network didn't like him calling out plays beforehand or breaking them down too in depth. Stupid.
  20. They should ban all pushing or pulling of offensive players by other offensive players The offense has enough fuging advantages.
  21. I am reading this differently. I think the Panthers are trying to "fool" the Bills into thinking Bryce will play Sunday. To what end, I have no idea.
  22. Okay, so we don't know if those numbers are still accurate?
  23. I don’t think there is nearly the level of conspiracy about this as people are assuming. DC and his staff probably do think Bryce is their best chancs to win because, well....they have been winning and the results have worked out. Why tinker with it? I don't agree but I can see pretty valid reasons why most coaches wouldn't make a change unless they had to. As fans, our "had to" threshold is quite a bit lower.
×
×
  • Create New...