Jump to content

kungfoodude

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    28,801

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About kungfoodude

  • Birthday 07/15/1981

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

kungfoodude's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

33.9k

Reputation

  1. kungfoodude
    T-Mac or possibly Walker. Almost everyone else is a trade down, IMO, although you say that is off the table. If you aren't mentioning Sanders being off the table, I would fail to see why a trade down isn't possible, however.
  2. kungfoodude
    It's basically a nothing answer. Makes sense.
  3. kungfoodude
    TBD. I think there is enough general uncertainty with what is going to happen at each pick that it could be a prime market to trade.
  4. kungfoodude
    Hard to say. Depends on if the heat ratchets up on Canales. If so, I suspect the first head on the block is Evero.
  5. kungfoodude
    I don't think the argument is about the book value but about the player and the overall strength of this draft seeming to be short on elite talent. Add the fact that we have a ton of roster holes and that explains why a lot of us are against it.
  6. kungfoodude
    Methinks perhaps he is an option if we trade down, which makes a lot more sense.
  7. kungfoodude
    Which, in that mold, Williams is that kind of guy.
  8. kungfoodude
    I like Warren as a mid to late 1st but not at 8.
  9. kungfoodude
    Odd hire for a one year HC.
  10. kungfoodude
    So basically a very poor man's Brian Burns? Yeah....that worked out so well for us the first time, let's do that again!
  11. kungfoodude
    He didn't sort of bust. He was a bust.
  12. kungfoodude
    Most of our issue with 2nd round WR's is picking the wrong guys. I personally don't think Higgins is the wrong guy. That said, I do believe his path to be a star receiver is unlikely.
  13. kungfoodude
    This is along the lines of what I was thinking. Would even consider future draft picks if someone balks at that sort of price.
  14. kungfoodude
    Trading up would be a stupid move. Trading up to get Carter would be a lightspeed stupid move. Trade down makes infinitely more sense in a draft weak on elite talent but deep in two deep/solid starter talent. It would be a very Tepper Panthers move to get this wrong.
  15. kungfoodude
    Another thing I keep coming back to, is he really a Bowers distance ahead of Loveland, Taylor, Arroyo, Fannin, etc? I don't see it.
×
×
  • Create New...