kungfoodude

As a FREE AGENT, absolutely so. He would be an insanely big upgrade from Bryce. We would finally have a QB capable of performing the upper 90% of NFL starters. Price depending, obviously. That being said, I would say the odds of Murray being a free agent are a lot smaller than you think. His odds of being moved are far higher than the odds of him being cut. They have until March 22nd to move him or his 2027 base salary is guaranteed.

I think that is the difference between elite guys and JAG's(or worse). The elite guys are better able to make those adjustments quickly. Certainly, one can argue that development can be hindered by the team/franchise but the cream does fairly consistently seem to keep rising.

I mean...I would love to hear any sort of logic of how Murray could possibly be construed as a worse QB than Bryce. How are you basing it? If not statistically, winning percentage? Well, I have bad news for your argument. So are we going, what, eye test? Well, I have even worse news than the last news. So after that what remains?

That's fine but if you don't figure it out until 5-6 years into the NFL what does it matter if you came in at 22? That is basically my point, it depends on overall development time whether you are 20 or 29.

Murray is not only better than Bryce but fairly significantly so. Both of those QB's have had significantly better careers to date and are still better QB's than Bryce.

That was the first time in NFL history the same player has had more than one TO on a single possession.

I think that depends on how quickly they adjust. That wouldn't be different if he had been drafted at 22.

I mean both Murray and Brissett are better than Bryce.

The more banged up they are, the better for us. We just have to capitalize on their weaknesses.

I have no idea what we would decide to do or whom would jump ship with Evero on the defensive staff. I presume someone with heavy ties to Dave Canales.

Even if you are somehow blaming Mahomes for that game, he isn't having a bad season overall by anyone but HIS standards. I'd be floored if Bryce was at 63% completion percentage, close to 4500 yds and 34 Total TD's. Sign me up for that kind of failure.

Versus just Bryce? Yeah, I think most scenarios that is true. I will say that neither of those guys is "winning" many must win games at the moment.

I do think that is going to be an interesting thing to track the next few drafts, the guys that stay longer in college and get more experience in different offensive system due to the portal. I tend to believe this will produce some better QB's in terms of NFL readiness.

That's why I wouldn't expect them to make the move. It's, at best, lateral. It probably gets a little more difficult if you consider salary situations. Yeah, I mean I would think that is the determination at the moment. If you want to take Tyrod vs. Bryce outside of that scenario, I think it might still be a coin flip. I personally would rather have Tyrod but it is the Jets.

I don't think the Raiders actually would. Geno has been bad but we have seen how terrible Bryce is with bad pressure issues. Bryce would actually be a downgrade in terms of ball security there. It's possible, though.