Mr. Scot

Evero should have been fired after last season's historic sh-t bomb. He's arguably better this season, but still not good enough. Not that it matters though given he's likely gone next season regardless.

Odd...Ive been assured (repeatedly) that he's not only the worst in the NFL right now but also the worst in league history

Move on from something that only others bring up when they're trying to deflect from their own incredibly weak takes? Odd suggestion But hey, if you can produce a genuinely original take that isn't just being a contrarian, I'll ponder listening. (no googling though)

Sort of agree, though I'd probably phrase it differently.

This game isn't an essential watch to understand Bryce's limitations. And also, like Linville, you're getting closer to where I am in why we need to move on from Bryce. And yes, we've seen the good, the bad and the ugly from Bryce. What we still haven't seen is consistency, and I'm doubtful that we will. So ultimately, this game didn't move the needle for me on Bryce in either direction. On Ejiro Evero?

Shough had a good game. Never said otherwise. Not so sure he's got a long NFL career ahead of him, though. I wouldn't call this game an example of a bad Bryce game. But even if I did, I'd still put this loss way more on Evero, Canales and some utterly dumbsh-t plays on behalf of several of our players. One bit of agreement though: Your final point comes closer than anything else I've seen to matching why I believe in moving on from Bryce.

Lemme think about it... Nah

Daniels I'd give you. Still not convinced on Williams. Maye and Stroud are my biggest wishes at the moment.

Keep trying, dude You never did clarify whether you actually believe what you're saying now or just sh-tposting again though

Don't need to when the opposing arguments are this dumb

I'd suggest uou probably should. It'd at least be better than trying to make arguments based on a game you didn't bother to watch

I'm sure I could resort to pointing out prior takes of yours rather than arguing actual arguments if wanted. I choose not to because I don't honestly remember any actual arguments you've made, good or bad. It's pretty much all been just responses to someone else's ideas. Perhaps you can remind me of an original thought you posted?

Did I miss Hunt playing today? "Yeah, we've had injuries but when we signed those guys we were considered to have one of the best lines in the league. Therefore, Bryce is bad." Did that argument really make sense to you when you wrote it? Come on, dude Likewise, "anything good he might have done is invalidated Bec he screwed up on that one play" isn't what I'd call solid logic either. And again, Bryce actually does get credit for the part he played in our wins, even as a rookie when he was at his worst. I know you wanna spin some sort of logic that denies that idea, but it ain't working... and it isn't going to. Your positions here from the very first post in this thread are all emotion based. It's not a good look. As said numerous times already, I want toove on from Bryce just as much as you do, but you really need to make better, more logical arguments. These posts ain't it.

Fitterer didn't have final say until Reich.

Never bought into the idea of games being rigged. Still don't... Today's officiating was next level sh-tty though.

And I'm certain you came to this conclusion by watching the game... Right?

That name crossed my mind

Right up there with "ya know, of our receivers would have caught everything thrown to them, our line made the right blocks every time and the defense would only have allowed three and outs, we'd have won. Bryce isn't even in the upper 70-80 percent of why we lost today.

Not saying you did, but the arguments you are making aren't significantly superior to that suggestion. Same here: Bryce has actually been a pretty effective runner. Hell, some games he's contributed more running the ball than some of the guys who get paid to do it. But if you wanna go this route, I'm gonna assume you've factored in the effectiveness of the respective offensive lines. Right? All of this ultimately boils down once again to the utterly ridiculous suggestion that any games we've won with Young under center were won in spite of him. There are very few arguments I find dumber than that one.

Rhule ran the whole damn show. Every player acquisition mistake he made cost us.

You could successfully execute a quarterback sneak with me under center if your interior blocking is good enough. On the flipside, we could have had Josh Allen under center and that playcall still would have failed. It was a dumb call.

That honor goes to Matt Rhule.

Sometimes it is. Hell, I've seen playoff level teams lose because they couldn't overcome nine points.

Not surprising, sadly. I suppose he might think it's funny. Not sure he understands how thoroughly stupid it makes his posts look, though

Ten other defenses managed to keep the Saints offense from scoring more points than their own offense did. Ours? Not so much