Mr. Scot

Receivers are easier to replace than pass rushers and good defensive linemen.

Quick callback...

Said elsewhere that money heals a lot of wounds. Not sure if it heals this one, but I guess we'll see.

Rounded off the top of his route rather than planting and cutting... Could stand to run smoother... Made the catch look harder than it should have been... Good genes but he needs some work

I understand... ... I think

That might depend on the poster. There are some huddlers who are very well practiced at being dicks.

I'm curious whether the people predicting he'll go to the Patriots have looked up who their OC is

Money heals a lot of wounds too. That said, this is a reunion I have a hard time picturing.

In 2015? Yeah. By 2020? Not so much. As to this season, people are already pretty excited but wait till we draft a quarterback and watch it kick into overdrive.

Speaking as an acknowledged member of the old and uncool, I have no idea what this means. I'm sure someone on here can explain though

Shannon Sharpe goes off on a rant (shocking, I know) Yikes

It's also logical. Honestly, that means as much to me as anything does. Sure, we could be hopeful after Rhule was hired, but it was something you had to talk yourself into. That's not true at all with Reich.

Understood

No argument. I do acknowledge the potential that choosing either one could wind up being a huge mistake.

I think that feeling is back, but it's not because of a player. It's because of the head coach.

But can it be compensated for?

They asked Fitterer if he could remember a pro day changing his opinion about something. He said most of the time it just reinforces what they already know as far as the workouts. The real opportunity, he added, is the chance to get to know the player as a person and get to hear what the people around them say.

Heh I've said numerous times there is absolutely nothing wrong with not knowing all the intricacies of football. It's a complicated game. It's the acting like you know when you really don't that's annoying. Not knowing though? Never a big deal. It's supposed to be fun, right?

I don't really give a flying rat's ass if there's chaos among fans as long as the pick ultimately turns out to be the right one.

I've seen a couple of analysts say the relatively low compensation The Cowboys had to give up for Cooks was going to make it harder for the Cardinals to get a great package in return for Hopkins.

I'm not just talking about the hot takes. I'm talking about just straight up mistakes. This past season, he mentioned a Bears player named Armstrong when there was no one by that name on the roster. He also predicted that Rashaad Penny would help the Seahawks win a game...eleven days after Penny had been placed on season ending injured reserve. As I recall, he also credited some roster move to a coach who had already been fired, but I don't remember who that was. Those are a couple of examples, but there are more, and loads of times where he completely flip-flopped a supposedly strongly held opinion. In an interview a while back, he mentioned that he's not really worried about whether he gets stuff right so much as he is about making his show entertaining. I remember thinking, "well yeah, that's pretty obvious".