Mr. Scot
-
Posts
140,837 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Mr. Scot
-
This season wasn't exactly a great advertisement for them
-
She advised me today after watching the Dan Campbell locker room video that she's officially Lady Lions Fan for the rest of this year's playoffs. (Dan Campbell is so good he can even fix Cowboy fans) 🫥
-
I'd prefer neither.
-
We're not. I mentioned him for illustration purposes.
-
-
Yeah, sure. Likewise, I'm certain that whole "asking whether people will tell us to @#$& off before officially putting in an interview request" thing was because Tepper was worried about having to beat potential candidates off with a stick
-
He certainly has the right to do that. And in response, the best available candidates - or basically anyone with other options - has the right to say "kiss my ass, dumbsh-t".
-
Unfortunately, I'd agree. But let's say they do let the new head coach decide on his own staff and he doesn't want Tabor or Evero. Then we've effectively prevented them from getting other jobs while not retaining them ourselves. It's kind of a dick move either way.
-
I'm not interested in either of them.
-
I'd like to say that's unrealistic. ... I'd really like to
-
Responses:
-
I get it. I'm just not a fan of letting trends affect that sort of decision. Ken Dorsey is technically a young, offensive minded coach. Would he be a better candidate than someone like Dan Quinn, though?
-
I know a lot of fans love that idea. I don't. Hell, at one point people on here were lobbying that we needed to let Deshaun Watson pick our next GM
-
If I recall correctly, the year that we hired Ron Rivera, oddsmakers had Bill Cowher listed as the betting favorite. (pretty sure Jon Gruden had nice odds as well)
-
See, this is where the logic of "Hey, let's do things like that one successful team" breaks down. It's fine to be impressed with the Steelers record. Using that as justification to request an interview with Matt Canada? Not so much
-
-
Without an offer of non-interference, I'm not sure how good a candidate we're going to get. Even if we do get a good coach, Tepper continuing to interfere may well sabotage him.
-
To be fair though, outside of McVay none of those have won a championship yet. Most are still in the realm of "good", not yet "great" (or in some cases even consistently good).
-
Generally speaking, very few of them would be in position to make a request like that. We're in a position where we might need it in order to get a candidate we want because our owner is a dumbsh-t.
-
I just don't think there's enough info out there to have confidence in Slowik. I want us to hire "consistently good", not "small sample good".
-
Vegas has two or three other names also out there who aren't actual candidates. I never take betting odds seriously as any sort of predictor.
-
The way my mom always used to say it was "if you have to tell me how smart you are, you probably aren't".
-
You gotta put that in writing. if a promise of non-interference isn't included in the contract, we're likely to be a very tough sell.
-
Turns out dropping your pants isn't as effective a coaching technique as people expected it to be
