Mr. Scot

Worst DE is probably Ray Seals. We signed him as a free agent in 97 (if I remember correctly) and he was terrible.

You'd have two DT slots, right?

Given those conditions, QB has to be Clausen or Weinke.

I caption this request.

Smitty was forgiven for those incidents under prior GMs. Gettleman is the guy who got rid of him, and got Jerry Richardson's blessing to do so. i don't know that I'd consider that a good sign for Hardy. Again though, this thread isn't about Hardy.

Oh, I think he'll get at least four, though I do accept six or more is possible. And yeah, I think it'll stand.

We're not in the court system anymore. We're in the league's disciplinary process, where the NFL generally gets what they want. And if they want to make an example of Hardy, they'll probably succeed.

I was thinking the shape of a shark. If course, there's the old theory that it was really Godzilla that sunk the ship and the military covered it up

A quick point to the folks who think the Ray Rice decision will help Hardy... Ray Rice filed his court case based on the fact that he had already been suspended without pay once for the same incident. The NFL was embarrassed when the video came out so they claimed not to know how serious the incident had actually been and suspended Rice indefinitely on the basis of this and the claim that he had lied to them. The judge who heard the case found the NFL's claim that they "didn't know what really happened the first time" to be bulls--t, and vacated the suspension based on that belief. None of that applies to Hardy. Hardy can't claim to be suspended again for the same offense because 1) he got his full paycheck and 2) because he voluntarily agreed to go on the Exempt List. And if you're counting on the NFLPA, remember that Adrian Peterson already appealed his suspension based on the whole 'double jeopardy / rules change' notion, and lost. Peterson is a way bigger star in the league. If the Players Association couldn't save him, what makes you think they can save Hardy? Bottom Line: The NFL could indeed ultimately decide not to suspend Hardy, but the more info I see the less chance I see of that happening. And if they do ultimately suspend him for two, four, six, eight games or such, I think you can pretty well count on it sticking.

And this? Supposedly the very iceberg that sunk the Titanic. Link: 15 of the rarest and most mind blowing photographs in history

"What's this" you ask... It's the original filming of this.

One thing I like about this pic is that their facial expressions really show their personalities. Benjamin comes off as a guy who knows he's making money playing a kid's game and is enjoying himself (which is cool, not a criticism). On the flipside, Luke is deadly serious and will trample anyone standing in his way

I'd love to know where the order to dump everybody but Rathman came from. You'd assume it came from the team. Would make Tomsula look like an a--hole if it were from him. (could be argued it makes him look like an a--hole anyway) They definitely let go of some decent coaches, Fangio and Brad Seely in particular.

Dude, that part's just not gonna happen. The NFL doesn't feel they did anything unfair putting Hardy on the exempt list. As far as us getting screwed on the cap, they'd put that in the old 'YP' category (i.e. 'your problem') for franchising a volatile guy in the first place.

Not Kalil?

Lack of trust by "Richardson and others in the building" (probably Gettleman) would be the reason.

"Act natural. Don't look them in the eye. Don't do anything to draw their attention."

Disagree on the article. I think it's a legitimate story, worth paying attention to. The disconnect is people making too much of how big a 'chance' there really is. Voth states in the story that the probability of this making a difference is pretty slim and he still ultimately believes Hardy won't be a Panther. But people latch onto his 'saying there's a chance' like a lovestruck Jim Carrey, so...

Two more names to consider... DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart

Honestly kinda surprised that only two people have mentioned Cam Newton, and one of those was with a big 'maybe' attached. Granted, pretty much everything I said about Luke Kuechly applies equally to Newton. But that said, Cam is the quarterback as well as being his team's former number one pick. Do you not see Newton being part of the inner circle?

That would knock both Greg Olsen and Derek Anderson off the list though as this past season was only the fourth for both. This coming year will be number five, but we're not there yet.

Lemme add a little something to this... I think some folks on here have trouble with respect to distinguishing what's 'fair' and what's 'fact'. Is it fair that Hardy faces increased scrutiny because the NFL royally screwed their handling of the Ray Rice story? Probably not. But is it fact? Oh yeah. It's a lot like when someone gets suspended for marijuana. You'll get some folks who wanna argue it shouldn't be against the rules. And you have a right to that opinion, but it has pretty much zero bearing on what's actually going to happen. Bottom line: You can spend a lot of effort talking about what you think should happen, but in most cases, those of us who see Hardy being gone and/or suspended are talking about what we think will happen more so than what should.

Harper hasn't been a Panther for long, but he's been in the league longer than most of the team and the young guys on defense already talk about him like a mentor. Plus he's a vocal leader with a great attitude. No, he's not originally a Panther, but technically neither is Olsen (though he's been here longer). It probably is a stretch, but I could kinda see it.

So...no. And to be clear, the rap video itself wasn't such a big deal as the timing and the situation. It lent further credence to the notion that he "just doesn't get it".

While I'm at it, lemme throw out a name for discussion... Yea or nay: Roman Harper