Mr. Scot

As of March 10th, he'll be very free.

That's pretty comical.

You confuse 'opposition' with 'you' Bored now. I've already given you more attention than you merit, so...

Oh, I'll happily debate anyone capable of an intelligent discussion. I tend to be dismissive of people who don't really bring anything of value to the conversation.

It reflects exactly how much I value your opinion and conversation.

Whatever you say, Skippy.

The fact that he actually did show up a few times kind of works against your theory. It just wasn't very often.

Only if you can find a constitutional right to play in the NFL somewhere in the Bill of Rights. Feel free to check, but I'm pretty sure it's not there.

Rivera made it pretty clear he'd be happy to have him around. And per the terms of the Exempt list, he NFL didn't have the right to tell him not to come around.

'Conduct detrimental' can be a really flexible phrase. I get what you mean, but didn't they already stand with Ray Rice?

'Conduct detrimental' perhaps. I don't think it happens myself, but it's possible.

A regular suspension forbids a guy from even being around the team. Hardy wasn't prohibited from being on the facilities or even being at games to cheer teammates on. He just didn't come around.

I'm amazed at how many people either don't know or just don't understand these facts. I'm of the mind that Hardy not 'choosing' to spend much of his considerable free time with his teammates did a lot to sour how the team felt about him. (all just speculation, of course)

You forgot the phrase "from the Dolphins".

By NFL terms, he hasn't actually been 'suspended' yet. The Exempt list is essentially a paid vacation. Suspension is unpaid and limits or disallows contact with the team..

Something his next team will have to account for. As for the team statement, it's your typical generic "yeah, we know" piece we see all the time.

Ah, the yapping terrier returns

Voth is probably the best source available for Panther info right now. That he has good contacts and sources within the organization is something pretty much no one doubts. Zod has testified plenty to that fact. If you wanna say he's wrong, show some evidence that contradicts him. If all you've got is you vs Voth, afraid you lose.

Gotcha, and I agree.

In other words, no.

That doesn't really say what you think it does though. He's saying Gettleman has nothing to do with the topic, not the decision. Reading further down the feed helps clarify. The GM is absolutely in on the decision.

What's your source that shows he's wrong? Do you have a better insider relationship with the team than he does?

Got a link or do I need to take your word for it?

He did more than tweet... http://blackandbluereview.com/dave-gettleman-intriguing-comments/ So, you have a better source than Voth?

People keep talking about Jerry Richardson... Do people just not know that Dave Gettleman exists?