Mr. Scot

I believe that about as much as I believed Baghdad Bob.

If you can get that kind of cap friendly deal. I'll grant that should be possible, but it's not guaranteed. If we sign him, I'll be on board. Just nervously so.

I look at him and I see Dan Morgan. Great when healthy, but never healthy.

Backing up one player with question marks using another player with question marks strikes me as too much risk. I respect your opinion, but you and I disagree on this one. Again though, if they try him out and think he's worth a shot, I won't scream. I'll be nervous, but I won't be upset.

What?

I think we define 'low risk' differently. To be clear, I'm not against the idea of giving him a try (after an extremely thorough physical, mind you). I just don't have a whole lot of faith in it.

You have no idea what a franchise tag is, do you?

You sure about that? I saw he was considering it but didn't see it confirmed.

Oher comes with his own risks.

See above. I wouldn't call it "low risk" with the number of times he's been hurt. Like I said, if you go this route, better be sure you have a backup plan.

Said above, I'd have no problem with looking at him, but you have to be real about it. He's failed to finish the last four seasons and had two straight ACL tears. That's not an easy thing for a man that size to recover from. You sign him, you'd also better be ready to sign someone else in case he goes down (which given his history is pretty likely).

You want to solve the question marks at tackle by signing a guy who can't stay healthy and is thinking of retiring? I'd have no problem with taking a look at him but thinking he comes without plenty of issues of his own is ignoring reality.

Oh yeah. A guy who's repeatedly said "this is out franchise quarterback" must really dislike him And we are free to tell you how silly your opinion is.

Nobody who knows the game thinks Boykin is being signed to be the #2 receiver. He's expected primarily to be signed as a special teams guy, maybe depth, and frankly could wind up just being a camp body. Throw in that free agency isn't over tomorrow. We have plenty of time, and after the initial frenzy the prices tend to go way down. Amazing that we spent so much time ahead of time on this board discussing how silly it would be to overreact within the first hours of free agency, and yet people still went ahead and did it

Hoping they plan on running a man scheme, because the last time someone stuck him in zone, he had his worst year.

Good lord.

I don't see us overpaying. Question would be where Gettleman would see his value.

What did you feel about the comment in AP that he might be looking for too much?

Worilds?

Good point.

Thanks Your analysis of which teams could go after Newton helped prove my point, by the way Apparently you're also not familiar with something called"The Franchise Tag".

Nah, Keep the updates coming. Ignore the trolls.

Eeeehhh, not really. Just chuckling at a troll who actually thinks he's "important". Somebody dumb enough to think they can predict the whole offseason less than six hours in is just laughable.

You're not that important, dude What you've posted is so uninformed it might merit a chuckle, but no 'hurt'. This is actually your most accurate statement so far.

I get the feeling everything he knows about football wouldn't fill an index card. The 'truth' has very little to do with any of the silliness you've posted. 'Pathetic trolling for attention' would be more accurate.