
Mr. Scot
HUDDLER-
Posts
139,938 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Mr. Scot
-
-
We've seen multiple sources suggest the Panthers don't love all of the top five quarterbacks, and more than one suggesting that it stops at Lawrence and Wilson. You might be able to throw Fields in there, but I'd have serious doubts about Lance or Jones.
-
If we drafted a project quarterback over an elite left tackle prospect, I would lose a lot of faith in our current braintrust.
-
Not solidifying our line would absolutely be a mistake, and given that 1) it's something both Fitterer and Rhule have pledged to do this offseason and 2) it's an oft repeated one already, it would be a tough one to forgive.
-
Lance over Sewell or Slater would be insane. You could conceivably make an argument for Fields at least, but not Lance.
-
If they repeat those mistakes, then yes I absolutely can.
-
Heard that before too. Each time we have a chance at finally solidifying our offensive line, we find an excuse not to. Then we wonder why we are where we are.
-
Like we did just two years ago? How many times in the past has this team thought they could get a left tackle in a later round?
-
Think of it this way... Would you prefer to have a starting quarterback and a starting left tackle or a starting quarterback, a backup quarterback and no left tackle?
-
Then why not help him out by taking, say, a left tackle? (especially given that you don't currently have one)
-
We've given the Packers a load of sh-t for taking Jordan Love when they could have taken someone to help Aaron Rodgers. Now we're suggesting the Panthers do the same thing?
-
This would confirm that the picks traded are not conditional.
-
Here's the thing: The Panthers aren't looking for CAMS REPLACEMENT. Some fans might be, but the Panthers are not. They're looking for a starting quarterback. And given the offense that we run, that quarterback's playing style might look a lot more like Drew Brees than Cam Newton.
-
You're not accounting for trade ups though.
-
Millet?
-
-
FYI: Atlanta is reportedly getting multiple offers for the number four pick. If there was any thought of dissuading teams from trading up, I'd say it's not working.
-
I'll just throw this here... Some years back, we drafted a guy who talked about "bad intentions".
-
Relevant to this discussion... I know some folks are still hoping that one of the top quarterbacks drops to the 8th pick. But the closer we get to the Draft, the more that sounds like a long shot.
-
Oh yeah, we also signed somebody else.