Mr. Scot
HUDDLER-
Posts
138,459 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Mr. Scot
-
Expect to see a whole lot of those short, quick passes today and a good amount of runs. That's the smart way to attack a high pressure defense like ours. Might see some trick plays too. Misdirection counteracts aggression.
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ellington should get credit for half a tackle on that
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
He'll do it himself
- 1,970 replies
-
- 2
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Good call. Rare drop by Smith.
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Throw to Ginn short, let him run it.
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Newton looking pretty accurate early. He and Olson are really in sync right now. Great downfield blocking by LaFell on that play to Olsen
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
HA!
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Davis whiffed on the sack...ouch Hold...ing...uncalled on that last play.
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Tim Ryan.
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I said elsewhere anybody watching that game should now understand a little better why I'm a fan of Mike Zimmer. The Bengals were down two defensive starters today, and even on a full day he's running that defense using rejects like Terrence Newman and Chris Crocker. Still held the Patriots in check and did so by not being afraid to be in Brady's face all day. Loved it.
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mike Smith is definitely a conservative coach. Even with his successes, there are Falcon fans who want him replaced.
-
Yeah, like that guy Belichick, opting for the field goal on 4th and goal at the 2 with his team down by 10 points. That guy is just gutless!
-
Hadn't thought of it being the guy's agent. That could make sense. He'd probably be wiser not to get his name out there though. That could definitely irk the team.
-
I could go for that.
- 1,970 replies
-
- 1
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Belichick opts for the field goal two scores down with his team at 4th and goal from the 2 yard line. Man, that guy just has no balls
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Vick hurt in Philly. Shocking, I know
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yep. Seriously doubt the organization wanted this information out there. I agree with doing the preliminary work now, but no, you don't want this known.
-
I don't think it's really an "active search" at this point, only preliminary stuff "just in case". Nobody knows. Likely suspect would be whomever the candidate in discussion is, but that's all speculation.
-
Our old friend LeGarrette Blount fumbled away the ball up in New England
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Luke Joeckel carted off the field against Saint Louis
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Gotcha. Perry Fewell probably would have gotten a bigger reaction
-
Why would Dave Gettleman need to do a background search on anyone in the Giants organization?
-
On Fox, Howie Long picks Carolina. Michael Strahan picks the Cardinals. Spite, perhaps?
- 1,970 replies
-
- Arizona Cardinals
- NFL
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Distinct possibility, especially given that it's counterproductive for the team to leak it. I'm probably one of the few people old enough to get that reference. Young bucks probably think you're talking about Manning
-
I'm withholding judgment on whether it was the right decision to retain Rivera till later in the season. And honestly, I don't think it reflects badly on us unless we leaked it, which I have a hard time buying into. Not saying I know more than you, but believing that what's being said here indicates "contact" requires reading something into it that isn't being said. The only definitive statement we have is that they're doing background checks. Saying one guys knows about it and saying we contacted him are very different conclusions, one supported by facts, one not. There's no indication that he's contacted anybody. All we know about is "background checks" which don't require, and generally don't involve, contact with the person being checked out.