Mr. Scot

It's an example of owners being bad owners. And while I get that it's what you want to happen, it's not guaranteed Tepper will do that just because others have.

There are people on here who insist such thinking is crazy.

Riiiiight. Jerry Richardson is a perfect example of what NFL owners shouldn't do. If you wanna frame him as anything else, I think we're done here.

You're referring to the guy who insisted on keeping Marty Hurney and reportedly told the personnel guys that Randy Moss was off limits? Yeah, sure.

I wouldn't go that far just yet. The good news though is that even if Christiansen doesn't prove to be our left tackle of the future, it doesn't sound like he'll be a wasted pick like Greg Little. It's very possible that he could man the left tackle spot adequately this year but be moved elsewhere next year in favor of a highly drafted or free agent left tackle.

Tepper can certainly interfere in decisions...if he wants to be another Jerry Jones or Dan Snyder. The most successful NFL teams have owners who trust their people. If the people prove they can't be trusted, then you get new people but you don't stick your nose in yourself. (at least not if you're smart)

I wouldn't even call him adequate. Three winning seasons out of fifteen doesn't qualify as adequate.

Appealing to "NFL history" is not only ambiguous, but meaningless. There are just as many hands off owners in NFL history as there are hands on. The reality is we're still talking about your feelings, not facts. The Athletic posted a pretty thorough behind the scenes story about the process that led up to Sam Darnold becoming a Panther. In that article, there were two names that were barely mentioned. One of them was David Tepper. The other one was Deshaun Watson. Now I know David Tepper is sitting next to you in the room and all, but even with that I don't think you have better sources than The Athletic does. You can hope all you want that David Tepper interferes and acquires your favorite player, but everything that's based in actual reality is pointing in the other direction. And frankly, I think we're all better served talking about the things that are actually happening than things we wish would happen.

I still can't believe there were people seriously arguing that Marty was doing a good job.

I'm saying when you combine that with Matt Rhule saying that Tepper leaves the football stuff to he and Fitterer, plus Tepper himself saying that he's not an evaluator and he's not going to try to be, it leads to a pretty obvious conclusion. And yes, I'll take their words as a better source than your feelings.

Tepper wanted Fields. We didn't take him. Those aren't just words. That's reality. You can continue to cling to a hope that what you want to happen will happen, but I just don't see it.

I would, because Matt Rhule said so. Heck, so did Tepper himself when he hired Fitterer.

For the same reason as before, because he thinks David Tepper will make it happen (also why he thought we'd draft Fields). Since we've now learned that Tepper isn't involved in football decisions, I'm not buying it. Honestly at this point, I'm not sure we were ever as "all in" on Watson as people thought. The behind the scenes stuff regarding the Darnold deal makes it sound like that whole thing was vastly overblown.

For the record, looks like we weren't interested.

He bid farewell to Washington because he's signing with Philadelphia.

Speaking as someone who's chucked his lunch midfield during a two-a-day, hell yes it's work if you're actually giving it your best. Congrats to your boy.

I'm pretty sure you could write everything you know about football on a Post-It note and still have room for a grocery list.

If Darnold doesn’t live up to expectations I suspect we'll look to the draft.

Not likely.

Two signed, three waived...not sure if that means something.

To make room for them on the roster, the team waived kicker Matt Ammendola, linebacker Daniel Bituli, and defensive tackle P.J. Johnson.

Wouldn't count on that. For one, barring a spectacular fail, I expect Darnold starts the next two years. But if it turns out he isn't the guy, I think we'll look to the draft for our next option.

That too. The pattern could very well indicate compulsive behavior. Looking beyond the legal stuff though, there's another aspect as well... The perceived interest we had before was all based around the idea that David Tepper wanted him and was willing to move heaven and earth to get him. We now know that Tepper (wisely) isn't driving football decisions, choosing instead to allow Fitterer and Rhule to run the "football stuff" without interference. That changes the whole dynamic.

We kept saying that same thing when the number of lawsuits were escalating too. And every time, the announcer kept saying "but wait there's more".

Word was that Tepper and some others in the building liked Fields, but Fitterer and Rhule didn't like him as much as Darnold. Rhule talking about how low the hit rate for first round QBs is would seem to confirm that story.