Mr. Scot

Exactly the kind of high quality rebuttal I always know I can expect

Based on the arguments you're making, that part seems pretty obvious

Ouch Is Charlotte FC included in that?

Re: the general state of NFL football...

More from John Ellis ... Expanding a little further... He's right. You also have to factor in pass heavy playcalling and the total lack of a strong run game (also scheme-related). That was my starting point when I made an analysis thread a few weeks back.

Above average turnover would seem likely, but the most important thing is that it's done wisely. Replacing good linemen like Bozeman and Ekwonu (as opposed to just changing things up to fit their strengths) wouldn't be something I'd call "wise".

Still not comprehending. And for the record, you never gave a good response to Fiz's rebuttal Day House "thesis" either. You really don't get it, but hey, kudos for trying What's especially funny though is that in the space of just 24 hours, you managed to both 1) claim my analysis was wrong, but also 2) claim you said it first. You've admitted to defending goofy points in the past just for the hell of it, but this time it seems like there's a reason. Apparently you're so desperate to win a debate with me that you'll go to some real extremes, even contradicting yourself. Oy

Also not exactly NFL, but...

"Mental gymnastics" Fitterer has things that are his fault. Coaches running a scheme that didn't fit personnel who were already here (and who they wanted to keep) is not one of them. You want the GM fired. We get it. We all get it. There are plenty of people that agree with you. But if you're going to make that argument, at least use supporting points that make sense. Otherwise you come off looking goofy.

Followed by actual NFL news from somebody most of us still actually like...

Not really NFL news but just because...

This guy gets it...

Part of the shame with Corbett is that by all accounts, he worked his ass off in rehab just to get back. Now he's out again after just a few games

Klein and Richardson have a good conversation going on this topic...

That could potentially be Christensen but my guess is they'd look elsewhere first. One big advantage for him is he actually does do well at zone blocking.

Same

John is sadly correct here...

Know what there's even less evidence of? Any hint that I actually said any of the things you think I'm saying Your reading comprehension needs a lot of work.

Would you consider this a fairly accurate summary or have they missed anything?

Also lost yet another corner...

Yeah, that's not gonna happen.

Correct that all teams use a mix. Also correct that all teams basically have their own playbook, though they tend to fall into categories (WCO, Coryell, etc). But in the same way that you can't run a Coryell without deep threats, you also can't run a zone blocking scheme when your personnel going from center left all don't fit that scheme. That's why I looked back at all the pre-draft and free agent analyses of our current lineman and some of our backups. In just about every case from the center left (except for Brady Christensen) all were noted to be weak in and / or not suited to zone blovking. Either not understanding or not adapting to that is a coaching failure.