parker

No. Darnold still has his issues. He was good enough to get us through the year. If we can upgrade the QB position, we need to do it.

Then the posts would be, "why didn't we double team Godwin. We failed to adjust to stop him."

We had 3 turnovers that helped them two. The Darnold fumbles were critical as much as anything anyone else did.

I'm not going to say yes or no. It depends on who else is out there. I am not as hard on Wilkes as most people. He had little to no say in the roster and coordinators. He also started with a 1-5 record. He came in and made the Panthers competitive for the remainder of the year. Darnold looked somewhat decent for the first time in a long time. I said earlier in the week that Brady vs our defense without Horn scared me a bit. That and some critical turnovers cost us the game.

It all comes down to the W.

I want to be optimistic, but it is hard with Horn out and Brady as heir QB.

We try to win, but several sacks are negated by roughing the passer calls.

I think it determines who the coaches are. If Wilks and McAdoo are back, you keep Darnold or PJ, not both. If McAdoo is gone, you find someone who fits the new system.

Gotcha. I might have gotten the topics mixed up. I think a good coach has to be both.

The same number as the Patriots with a coach from a defensive background.

The Rams have a worse record than us this year. Just saying.

Wilkes is making a strong case, but there are still 4 games left to play. All I ask is that we beat the teams we should beat and are competitive against the better teams. If he goes 4-0 over the next four games, making him 8-4 on the season, I think he deserves a contract extension and an offseason. If he goes 2-2 then it's up for grabs. Their is no doubt the play is night and day difference post Rhule.

I wish him well, but to be realistic, he lost his job to PJ Walker and Sam Darnold.

It's one game against a team that didn't know he was on the roster until 2 days before the game. Let's see how he does when the other team has time to prepare for him. Otherwise, it's the backup QB syndrome.

We got a bye week at a good time. If we can catch a little momentum, it could be a good season.

He has this team playing ball. But let's see how he leads through the season. Finish out the year and decide.

It's not like he has much better options.

Robbie's "What's that bear doing?" That was pretty much the summation of Rhule's career here.

That's like going back to your ex-spouse because you both got divorced again.

If he can produce, he stays. I don't see it happening, but it's all about the Ws. We're about to find out really quickly if it was Rhule or the coordinators that had this team sucking on Sunday.

I missed the televised version, but love the hit he put on the kicker. LOL

It seems when we get a player nobody wants, it's Rhule's decision. Good picks are Frit. If we won the last two games, it would be because of the coaching staff winning in spite of Rhule. Everything bad is Rhule's fault, every good thing is someone else's it seems.

I think he personally gets some unfair criticism. For god's sake if the hot dog vendor gave someone a undercooked dog, they'd be blaming that on Rhule too. But the bottom line is as a head coach, he has the responsibility for the W/L and he has not produced. I don't think he is as bad as some people like to paint him, but he isn't good enough to win right now. I'm still giving him this season, but third year, he needs to be able to move from a close loss to a close win at the very least.

Last year when we were 2-0, were we the best team in the league?

Ironically, if he had said Coach Rhule sucks, his opinion would be legitimized because that's what people want proof of. But the big picture is that coaches are measured by wins, not how good a person they are.