shaqattaq

Damn, that escalated quickly! BTW, I'm gonna shoot that fugger!!! lol.

Randunz has been my rd 2 guy from the get go, when I assumed we'd go QB at #8. That hasn't changed, the guys beast, and stood out while I was watching lance tape. Jenkins looks like your friend's nerdy little brother, but plays angry! Always seems to put that extra little FU at the end of a play, I love that! FWIW, he has 7 starts at LT to go along with his 25 at RT, so he can play over there if needed, at least in college.

Sneakers. I don't play tennis, but I do sneak sometimes. 99% of the time I'm in flops though.

Nope, Jags going with Jose Borregales, K, Miami! You saw it here first.

good point. They can grab Chase at 6, and a star RT at 18. They have picks 35 AND 50 in rd 2. A starting guard can be grabbed at either spot, and their cap is $9M richer.

I sure hope not. I wish he said what we got. It had better be everything.

Oh, no doubt. I think there is a very small chance they get "their guy", even if there is one, and have absolutely no data to support my theory. I'm just saying that if Wilson (for example) falls, he's the pick. I personally am all in for a LT. The more articles like this I read, the more I am optimistic about Darnold. Certainly, the poor bastard never had a chance in NY.

I hadn't seen this perspective yet. His rookie center was so bad that they backed a truck load of money up to Ryan Kahlil's house to get him to un-retire and he had missed a lot of the prior 2 seasons with nerve damage to his neck!

Again, first round quarterbacks aren't guaranteed to be franchise quarterbacks either. That, plus if Darnold actually is good, then you stupidly wasted a first round pick when you could have used it on a player to make your team better. I think Rhule & Fitterer have a QB in mind (don't know who) that they will snatch up at 8 IF he falls. That would be an excellent reason not to exercise Darnold's 5th year option. Granted, that could just be a smoke screen to fool teams wanting to trade up, who knows. I do think Darnold has as much potential as 95% of the qb's available in the draft. the big question is can we get him to reCH that potential.

Look at me, I pulled 60% chance he's gone outta my @$$, and you have an algorithm to back it up.

Agree, 1-3 are 99.9% QB's. Really good chance at least 1 more goes in front of us (trade or ATL). That leaves 3 non-QB picks ahead of us, and I think 1 of them is Pitts. Unfortunately, Sewell is probably the next best player. Maybe a 5th QB goes, maybe a defensive guy or a WR, hell, maybe Slater or Darrisaw is higher on Detroit's board... Anyhoo, I'm thinking there's about a 60% chance he's gone personally. Edit, I think there's a 90% chance Slater is still available at 8, so I would not be a fan of trading up from 8.

That is SO very disturbing.

My cousin married a hog farmer, and that's his favorite line.

OK, according to the link, Miami traded #6 to Dallas for #10, then traded #10 to us for #8, which we traded to philly for #12. Clear as mud! I've thought about the idea of trading for miami's # 18, & 36, so that was my first thought here, It's a bit convoluted. And also, why the fug do we see Slater as a guard when everyone else in the world sees him as the #2 LT available? That's even harder to understand.

ACDC Night Prowler

Darrisaw is my #3 LT, and my target IF we decide to trade back a few picks. I have absolutely no qualms about double dipping at tackle, but for rd 2, I'd go for one of the top right tackles, Jenkins or Mayfield, if they're available. That way, we can let Moton walk if he continues to play hardball with his long-term deal. I love Moton's play BTW, but business is business. My preference is still CB at #39 though.

I really don't think so. Would he have made bad decisions? Sure, his tendency to look panicked and force the ball into some questionable situations is well documented; even coming out of college. Also documented is the fact that he has the physical talent to succeed IF he can settle down and make better decisions. The only question I have is whether Rhule/Brady/Ryan can coach his natural tendencies and 3 years of terrible coaching out of him. Who the fug knows? If we put an O-line in front of him, I do think that he is in a perfect place to succeed.

I would NOT be opposed to trading back into the teens before we get our LT. Plenty of talent in the later 1st to early second. plus an extra round 2 pick will help out a lot with our other needs.

I agree 150%

@MHS831, #'s 35, 37, and 38 really hurt my feelings, Mills, Freirmuth, & Leatherwood I want all 3 at 39. Love Sewell though.

This is my prediction as well, especially since Burrow requested him by name. I've been saying that we likely draft a LT at #39, so no reason they can't at #38.

I definitely want 1, if not 2, in the mid-to-late rounds, especially if one of them has a shot at center. IMO, we get CB and LT in rds 1 & 2, then start looking to IOL, LB, FS, TE, WR. We should be able to find a starter/significant upgrade for 1 of those positions at 73, and a solid contributor at 113. Man, I hope we draft as well this year as it appears we did last. I'm all giddy with anticipation!

Either way, Lance to ATL makes sense, assuming they go QB.