shaqattaq

2005 game against Cowboys? Source: https://www.espn.com/nfl/news/story?id=2270894 Don't forget this steaming pile of BS! https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2237224-luke-kuechly-ejected-for-contacting-official-during-panthers-vs-packers

According to the snap counts, Michael Jordan played 1 snap against the Seahawks so that has to be the one play being referenced. Mays lined up at FB on a few plays.

Then explain it. I missed the end of it, what did Burns do that was so bad?

We had a pretty good team with a sh-t coach. Now we have a pretty good team with a pretty good coach. I know that Tepper specifically said that he wanted a young, offensive and Wilkes is an old, defensive coach, but, IMO, it should be Wilkes' job to lose.

especially since his salary is fully guaranteed.

As long as we don't have to depend on him to win us the game, i.e. wining the time of possession, take aways, and dominating the line of scrimmage, all he has to do is be a game manager. If he can do that, we can win.

And serving up some gourmet poo!

Biggest difference between the 2 coaches that I can see is that Wilkes uses what he has and Rhule was to proud to change HIS plan to fit the players on the field. Case and point: Darnold is a mediocre QB, at best, so Wilkes brings in 2 extra linemen and runs the ball down their throat. Not even Darnold can screw up handoffs and checkdowns.

I don't know, he laid the wood on one of our coaches! Was that Al Holcomb?

"you should definitely drop Darnold from your fantasy lineup."

After turning down two 1st round picks and a 2nd, I think he already knows that we want to keep him around.

Or a rookie! I'm not sure about flipping Mays until I see him in action.

and you have to walk under 47 ladders to reach the PSL sections.

I think that at this point PJ gives us the best chances of winning, by a lot. Which is just frikin sad!! So, I guess how you vote on this depends on if you want to win or not. At this point the majority seems to not. I told my dad yesterday that I can't help but want them to win while I'm watching the games, but I sure don't get all sad any more when they lose. BTW: we need to make sure Baker does not hit 70%. A 5th for him is still getting fleeced.

To answer your question, I feel that a superstar HC is more important that a superstar QB. A great coach can make his players look better that they are (look at what's going on with Russell in Denver). However... A superstar coach would know that we tanked, and would recognize the talent (good and bad) on our roster when making a decision. Edit: This would have been an entertaining poll question.

At this point, half the nfl teams could be trying to tank! Ironically, Philly's winning the SB and still picks #4.

I like how tremble is coming along recently as well. They're letting him catch the ball some. Also, Wilkes even figured out how to get value out of Erving, one of the worst non-QB moves made under the Rhule regime, bringing him in as an extra run-blocker. If that ain't polishing a turd, nothing is.

Hot Lava Vagina! A buddy of mine caught that some years back. He was in terrible shape.

Maybe YOU should stop doing shrooms! I like the creativity though...enjoy your trip.

He couldn't catch the clap in a Pensacola whore house!