Jaxel

To be fair, I don't watch a ton of tape on these players, but Waddle's numbers dropped every year, even as Bama's offensive production went up. On the other hand Smith's production went up every year. I think I would prefer Smith or Chase over Waddle. Waddle reminds me a bit of that Clemson receiver that came out a while ago, he ended up just being a return specialist. Just my observation.

Obviously you are in the know Verge. In a crazy scenario where 5 qbs and a lineman and Pitts go. Waddle or Chase?

I feel like the stars show what I mean. Out of 31 deep passes, 27 were a tight window, as compared to 4 in an open window. That means a staggering 89% of his deep passes were thrown to a heavily covered receiver. This as compared to say, Tannehill or Bridgewater, per say, who saw tighter cover more in the 75% range... I just think there is more to it the success, than just numbers. But I'm a half glass full kind of guy, so I'll gladly own it if my excitement ends up being misplaced.

Great research. Thanks for putting this together. I'd be curious to see the same metrics from a receiving standpoint, as play design, open targets, wr receiver win rates, etc might tell a story too.

Watch that to see just how much time he had to process anything.

Israel Mukuamu in the 4th, tall lots of talent.

Smokescreen, trying to get some one to trade up in front so more blue chip options drop to us. That's my story and in sticking to it.

1. Sewell/Slater, T 2. Randol moore, wr 3. Aaron Robinson, Cb

Love this.

I think one time will trade out for the QB hungry team.

Def get you, I'm happy with either lineman, but I love Chase. Did is awesome.

Honestly would love to see chase fall.

Thanks, one more question, who is your surprise top 10 pick?

Hi Verge, it sounds like Pitts won't be available at 8, but should he or Chase be available with Slater still on the board would they consider either?

I'm with Mr. Scott, Penei Sewell. If he is not available and somehow Pitts or Chase are on the board. I consider one of those two over Slater. Otherwise is Sewell or Slater for me.

Sit back and know that your getting one or the following - Sewell, Slater, Chase, Pitts, Horn... Smile all the way to the podium.

Sewell/slater/chase/waddle/pitts. In no particular order. Surround the QB with talent.

When we you get hit so much and have no confidence in your O Line and clean pocket probably doesn't mean as much.

If we get a choice between those two, I'll be happy.

His family definitely thinks so. Lol

Sometimes haters gonna hate.

If the niners don't take him, mac jones is the pick

To be fair, I think most would feel there would be more credibility if it wasn't a known liar and big mouth lawyer stumping his case on twitter. Atleast that's how I feel. In either case, normally when it's this amount of people coming forward, there lies some truth in the allegations. Regardless, it's a shame this has happened and I hope for the fair and proper resolution to it, regardless if which party has to face the consequences.

Sometimes you got to let the loin cloth do the talking.

What is with sewell dropping in so many mocks recently?