bythenbrs

Age or money in his wallet?

I brush my teeth with bottled water when abroad.

You have a good grasp on human nature.

Well, there is no ambiguity in that response. LOL

Agreed. Luck may include being drafted by a team with good coaching and system (right place, right time), not getting seriously injured, talented roster with all the pieces in place on O and D, and then the universe smiles upon you, sprinkles you with fairy dust (masculine scent of course) and you get all the right calls and breaks. Who can explain it?

[tip toeing quietly out of the room... ]

Curious how big you see the talent gap between Hooker and 'the four'. Do you see a major talent gap or are you more on his age and ACL injury?

Collusion? How about each owner independently looked at the Watson contract and projectile vomited?

Draft him at the very tail end of R1 and we get five years on that first contract.

You're not the only one... "We few, we happy few, we band of brothers... "

Bye Shaq... Love ya but, you gotta go.

There are more QB's worth drafting than just 'the four'...

The Ravens tag Lamar. “Your move.”

The team was better under Hess family ownership, and I threw up in my mouth just writing this…

I’ll grant you both points, though I’m not sure that any of ‘the four’ will be ready to start the first game of the regular season, unless you subscribe to the ‘throw ‘em into the deep end of the pool and make them swim’ theory. I think you can still get two contracts out of Hooker before the team needs to move on to someone else. If you take Hooker at the bottom of R1, you could get five years out of that first contract. All speculation on my part but, until the draft, what else do we have to do?

LaPorta for sure but, that one handed catch by Washington on the corner route at the combine gave me the ‘tingles’. Would be thrilled with either and LaPorta should be available at 39. Question is, how do we wrangle both LaPorta and Uzo? I want them both.

Here’s a thought experiment: A. What if the new administration thinks more highly of Hooker than most of the draft experts here on the Huddle? Not that Hooker is better than any of ‘the four’, but that the gap between Hooker and ‘the four’ is not as great as many here perceive? B. What if the new staff believes Hooker is actually less risk per unit of draft capital invested?

Which year?

There’s a vaccine for that…

“All the world will be your enemy… and when they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you… “

Not to worry. Cosmopolitan magazine has assured us that size doesn’t matter…

Shouldn’t Levis be available at 1R3? Who likes Levis better than Stroud and Young except apparently the Panthers?