bythenbrs

I was first in the mile among all backs and ends (wideouts and TE's). I'll never publicly give up my 40 time, though. No bueno.

To answer my own question, T may be the BPA at 8.

Let me respond from a different view… What player that will likely be available at 8 do you consider to be a sure fire pick? From all the mocks I’ve seen, I’m not really sure anyone likely to be there is worth pick 8, hence, why I’m in favor of trading down for an extra pick(s). It looks like picks 8 to 20 are interchangeable. This draft looks very light at the top, in terms of immediate starters, future all pro players. BPA at 8 just doesn’t look very strong compared to prior drafts. YMMV.

Truly curious. Would you take him at 8 and if yes, what other players would have to be off the board to make you take him? I have wavered back and forth on what players I would take him ahead of at 8.

There's underwear fast and then there is game day fast. Are we sure that he is game day fast? Pro day 40's can be charitable to players.

If he can become a light beer version of Star, I'd seriously consider him. Star was underappreciated for what he was; a space eater that kept OL players off of Luke, so that Luke could make great plays

‘B’; Golden is the speed and YAC guy missing on the roster. That said, I’m concerned he may be a little small to body up with bigger corners.

You were doing so well up to that point…

Our FO never learns… [sigh]

“Danny, get me the ball.”

Mike Green, buh bye

Dog vomit was the phrase I was thinking of but, booth cheeks works, too.

Suggests Morgan thinks the problem was more roster than Evero or his staff?

I'm not comfortable trading back farther than 12-16. We should still have our pick of really good DL and Edge.

It is his hill to die on. The man has commitment.

(1) DT/NT, (2) Edge, but two of the three should be starter capable their rookie year, one for development

If he’s available late day 2 (probably not), I’d do it…

Cam could have learned an invaluable life lesson from Thumper’s father… Thumper’s Mother: “Thumper, what did your Father teach you?” Thumper: “If you can’t say something nice, don’t say nothin’ at all.”

No, thank you. This is not the right time in the rebuild cycle. We need two really productive drafts and then we can go looking for ‘the missing piece’.

No disagreement with you on the evils of reaching. Just seems fortuitous that our most glaring need aligns with the strength of this draft. I would think that would improve the probability of getting potential starters in the first three rounds. But, yeah, Gettleman screwed the pooch with the Norman fiasco.

Meh. If the scouting department and Morgan are pounding the table, that T-Mac is truly BPA at 8 then go with it, I guess. I’d rather see us go front seven with the first three picks, and that would be drafting into the strength of this draft. Crazy concept, right?

“It’s gotta be the hair, Cotton; it’s beautiful, feathered and lethal. You just don’t see it nowadays.”

Good for Wilks if that happens. Happy for him.

I had a crush on Hooker. Rather than ‘go get your guy’, I was content to take Hooker in the late first or early second. Interesting that Johnson wants to bring him to LVR. He must see something in Hooker. Time will tell if he is starter material or just a placeholder who knows the offense until someone better can be brought in.