Jump to content

electro's horse

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    8,162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by electro's horse

  1. there was a thought at the time that he just didn't have the body to survive in the nfl; that a strong breeze would kill him and i mean i get it. he's a lanky dude. i saw him kick at georgia tech and he looks weird as hell out there
  2. are you fuging illiterate you claimed "Every other NFL team brings in competition for their kickers." This is for one team. 1. 30 less than 31 needed for what you said to be true. shut the fug up
  3. is there a different OP that actually says what you claim or are you talking out of your ass (hint: you're talking out of your ass)
  4. this is just stupid bro thinking kicking is almost entirely mental and no one has any idea how to evaluate kickers or coach them
  5. not really as long as they make moves now. kickers are really fungible and several starter quality kickers end up cut every year, like this one it's not like anyone is worried about the kicker gelling with the team or whatever every year there are like 1 or 2 incredible kickers, 1 or 2 dreadful ones, and everyone else is replaceable.
  6. judging by photos, you're clearly pretty good at neglecting yourself already
  7. oh my bad, yeah, im confusing him with perryman
  8. he's on the bench if he doesn't get his ass vaccinated
  9. Marshall is ideally probably third in targets, at best? Certainly you dont want him getting more than CMC and Moore. He might do better in that role than Horn does as the presumptive CB1, who's to say.
  10. Gantt did not leave PFT on good grounds and I can't imagine anyone is going to leak to a team reporter WHO WOULD THEN leak to PFT that they're going to go after a sex pest
  11. Florio has no sources with the panthers and he's just throwing poo against the wall
  12. should probably be more worried that his best case scenario is jake delhomme
  13. certainly not donte certainly moore maybe burns? or could be a player like robby anderson just to create some cap room, though i suspect they may be comfortable letting Marshall be the number 2 next season
  14. tied for 28th in attendance in 2020 23rd in 2019 obviously things were a little weird this year http://www.espn.com/nba/attendance/_/year/2019
  15. I spoke specifically about how public funding never plays out, not the "economic benefits" of stadiums in general, of which are generally concentrated into a few mega wealthy owners and a pittance of low wage jobs. buts lets play. lets pretend you're actually arguing in good faith and aren't just upset because i overturned your apple cart of comforting truths that you roll around in your head while imaging that some day your meaningless middle management job will turn into something you're not embarrassed to tell your dad about. of the hundreds of studies you claim exist, im assuming you mean this https://www.charlottecentercity.org/call-to-action-support-the-carolina-panthers-and-bank-of-america-stadium-improvements/ which is the only thing i can find for 600 million dollars. This is of course from 2013, and referring to a stadium that was NOT publicly funded. im assuming its this because you quoted it directly. i guess you were so eager to finally find one of the "hundreds of studies" that you didn't bother looking at the date. and of course, this doesn't even imply what you think it does, since it's not claiming "revenue"; it's claiming "economic impact." what is economic impact? sounds to me like a buzzword created by marketing types to try to fleece the government out of free money, and sway ignorant, low information voters/information consumers like yourself. which, clearly, it did. also lmao this fluff piece talks about 5,000 jobs. assuming this correct, how many a. are full time (none) b. pay a living wage (few) c. have benefits (lmao) And who is the charlotte center city organization? essentially its a trade organization of private businesses that lobby the city government to build things. IE people that want the public to pay for things that will benefit them economically. so to recap, of the "hundreds of studies" you claim to exist supporting the idea that public funding for sports stadiums pays out in the end, which of course would be what you were doing if you had any reading comprehension, you 1. picked an article from 2013 2. that's about a privately funded stadium 3. that doesn't even refute what i said 4. that was begging for government money from a private group if this was the best thing you can find about those hundreds of articles im assuming you've read, or else you wouldn't have referenced them, you don't need to respond. just go back to dreaming about one day finishing that mba so you can follow the path of michael scott or whatever pitiful example you model your life after
  16. There have been innumerable studies on the effects of cities subsidizing stadium construction and across the economic spectrum, from fresh to saltwater economics, it never pans out. it's always a waste of money. when you're having to justify it with 4th and 5th degree effects you should probably just stop posting. like lmao gas station revenue? get the fug out
  17. how did you read that post and come to any of those conclusions like what are you trying to say
  18. remember when the voters of charlotte told george shinn to go fug himself instead of paying for a new stadium, the referendum failed and he left town, then the city council voted to build a new stadium anyway lol lmao
×
×
  • Create New...