WUnderhill

I mean, there’s definitely a chance. They have the ammo if they really want to and think they need to. In my completely unprofessional, uninformed opinion, I’ll put it at around 20%

Top Center and WR on the board with the first 2 picks. After that, don’t care. Arguments for CB, LB, Edge, OT, TE, S, DL, RB, double or triple WRs. With 7 picks the math ain’t mathing to be able to address every position, and realistically not everybody is going to work out from who we do pick. As long as we nail WR and finish fixing the OL, we’re good.

Just FYI, that USA Today quiz is from 2021 and is no longer accurate. For example, question 3 “Which of these schools has not had a #1 overall pick since 2000?” The “correct” answer is Alabama, and I think we all know that is not true anymore.

Omg lol that’s some arena football looking poo right there. Hard to find a good thing to say about those, everything is terrible. Curious what all the Texans fans on this board think.

Just throwing the 1st next year out the window bc it’s not happening, I said top 40 and second next year which is also very unlikely to happen.

Imagine being born today and this is the first time you’ve heard a player say “x team said if I’m there at pick y they’re taking me” only for it not to happen on draft day. It’s almost like it makes no sense for a team to definitively say that without knowing how the board will fall, or like these players might have agents who tell them to leak things like this to increase the public perception that he’s a first round talent.

Thread revived for Chark update; anti Bryce obsessionist quotes 10 day old post to make it about Bryce Young again. Par for the course.

I’m not sure how that’s relevant unless you are suggesting he was critiquing the play calling before they started calling plays. Obviously he liked the coaching staff before the season began or that wouldn’t have been the coaching staff. Everything went to poo pretty fast and deserved to be critiqued from game 1 on. Whether Tepper is competent as an owner is a completely separate matter. Has the playcalling been poo and deserving of being critiqued? 100% yes it has.

Well we didn’t have a top coaching staff, we’ve had the worst coaching in the league for the past 4 years.

We haven’t had a coach whose playcalling didn’t deserve to be critiqued.

Didn’t even notice they were gone, tbh.

Well they aren’t using 2 roster spots on a long snapper I don’t think so what’s the point?

When they say “realistic” just know it means intentionally bad.

Panthers just putting it out there so nobody jumps into the end of the first round for a WR or C.

I should have included this in my first post but can’t edit anymore. I also think the potential value of the pick to other teams will largely depend on what New England does. New England is the only team until pick 44 that will be looking at QB, and that is only if they don’t draft one at pick 3. If NE doesn’t draft a QB at pick 3, I could also see them potentially trading back into the end of the first round to get a QB with the 5th year option and also prevent a team from jumping ahead of them via trade with us to get their guy. Every other team from pick 33 to 44 either has their QB, has a QB they drafted high last year that they’re still committed to, or will be drafting a QB high in the first round. That being said, it would take an awful lot for me to trade all the way down to pick 44 or lower if I’m the Panthers, and I don’t see why a team would be trying to come all the way up to 33 for a QB if the Patriots get a QB in round 1. 39 may end up being the more likely pick to be traded to teams trying to get ahead of the Raiders at 44.

For some perspective, notable recent #33 picks include: Will Levis, Tyson Campbell, Tee Higgins, Austin Corbett. The Cardinals received picks 41, 72, and a 2024 3rd from the Titans last year for pick 33 and 81. Both these picks the Cardinals gave up were picks they had received in trades in the first round. I don’t think this pick was as valuable or important to the Cardinals as it is to us since it is our first pick of this draft and may be our only shot to get a first round talent.

They love to trade our pick 33 for poo in these mock drafts. The Panthers better not trade our potential starting Center for the next decade for a nickel corner and a bottom of the third round TE. Trade value charts be damned. There will be guys there that we have first round grades on, and you want the Panthers to drop 20 spots and give up a legitimate premium player for a 3rd round pick this year and next year? Gtfo.

Just one more loss for the 3rd worst record and even odds for the #1 pick. Anybody know how the tie breakers would work if the Hornets win the final game and end with the same record as SA and Portland?

We’re discussing him because hours ago the Jags signed his better counterpart to the exact same deal, which was information we did not previously have and makes the Panthers deal look better. You knew this was a thread about the Burns deal before you opened it nobody is forcing you to talk about it, I just don’t see the point in you trying to keep others from talking about it.

Great contribution. God forbid we discuss something that just happened today that adds perspective to something that happened just a month ago. There’s so much else going on right now after all.

Josh Allen of the Jags just signed pretty much the exact same deal as Brian Burns. 5 Years, $150m, $88m guaranteed. Both guys are about the same age (25 & 26yrs old), same measurables (6’5 250ish), first round draft picks in the 2019 draft, similar career sack numbers (45 & 46). But uh oh, there’s a few key differences. Josh Allen is coming off the best year of his career with 17.5 sacks. Brian Burns is coming off his second worst behind only his rookie season. Josh Allen lost half of the 2020 season to injury and their career sack totals are neck and neck despite Brian Burns playing 6 more games. And Josh Allen is twice the run defender Burns is with a run defense grade of 82.4 to Burns’ 56.3 over the past 2 seasons, and a pass rush win rate of 17.5% to Burns’ 11.6%. We actually got the Giants to send us the 39th pick in the draft for the right to overpay Brian Burns.

Idk, we need to get really scientific here. Anybody have a waist up picture of him next to Mina Kimes?

Glad to see they’ve got their priorities in order: 1. Virtue signal so you can get an espn article. 2. Find the right HC.

Lol imagine crying about the dude not looking swole after 3 months and then talking about reality.