CoastalCat

Bup Bup Bup Bup Bup, back to the Dollar Store...

Agree. Unless his source is DG or Jerry, don't see how anyone else would be able to make that final decision at this stage(i.e. before reinstatement, discipline, or even the start of free agency).

Here is the full ruling: http://a.espncdn.com/pdf/2015/0226/DotyPetersonruling.pdf

She's still a bus driver? Dang 35 Jelly Bean, take care of your mom.

How playing after surgery doesn't affect play is something you're going to have to further explain. Particularly surgery on the legs of a running back.

You sure? http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2263748 "Davis, 31, missed most of training camp as he rehabilitated from the knee surgery that limited him to only two appearances in 2004. He returned to practice toward the end of camp, when he was removed from the physically unable to perform list, and began the season as the Panthers' starter. But in recent days, Davis has been hampered again by knee problems, and his right knee swelled considerably this week. When it did not respond well to treatment, the Panthers decided it was pointless for Davis to try to continue the season. It is not yet known if he will require further surgery to address his longtime knee woes. Panthers general manager Marty Hurney, quoted by The Associated Press, called the move "disappointing," adding that the team's decision wasn't based on medical tests."

Wasn't he injured in 2005?

Whoa there!! Dwayne Jarrett was WAAAY worse than both Kerry Colbert and Armanti.

I didn't mean case like "court case". I meant more in the phrase i.e. "He called in sick the day after the super bowl. It doesn't help his case that he hosted a kegger that night" Anyway, I mean that the NFL is considering whether he was in the wrong regardless of the outcome of the trial, and might suspend him further. The potential financial settlement wouldn't help his "situation". I read an interesting situation on Clayton's Mailbag yesterday (just an idea) where, if Hardy was found to be in conflict with the personal conduct policy, he could pay back an amount equal to six-games salary, and the NFL would consider it time served. With that being said, is it bad for me to wonder in the back of my mind whether he still has an amount equal to 6 games salary?

I don't like this outcome. Settlement implies guilt. Doesn't help his case with the NFL.

Done! Good luck!

Valid point. I like that we try to keep good dudes around. PS: I only said "speech" because I pictured you on a mountain top.

That's a fantastic speech, but it still all comes down to perception. The difference between another limited character guy who just played in the super bowl and Greg Hardy is an abuse accusation. Skittles is getting his extension.

And 1 of those 7 was with Hardy, so....

I completely disagree with the idea that he'd need to pay back his money if he's acquitted. If I'm falsely accused of stealing from my job and am suspended with pay, I'm not paying my salary back when they finally get their sh** straight. Hardy signed that agreement expecting to be done with his trial by late October. Maybe I've missed out on some information over the past few months, but I don't understand why an acquittal would still completely rule him out as a panther. Not saying he'd 100% be back, but I'm getting the impression that he's still 100% out even with the acquittal. Someone fill me in.

The photo of Cam screaming at Underwood made me laugh out loud. He looks terrified. Sent from the beach

So what is starting secondary looking like as far as personnel? Who is working with the first group? Still Cason/White, and Harper/Decoud? Sent from the beach