
AU-panther
HUDDLER-
Posts
4,182 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by AU-panther
-
Poor question, the chance of all 3 being there at 8 is slim. Every year the huddle argues who they want out of guys that most likely won’t be there . Better question would be Slater, Smith, Parsons, or Surtain?
-
If two say a 3rd then that means someone will probably have to give a second.
-
I think most of us agree that the Jets went out of their way to tank last year. You don’t tank for a OT or WR, you tank for a new QB. They missed out on Trevor but I think they like QB2 enough to continue with the plan. Personally I would think it would take an obscene offer for them to trade down.
-
Lance is still in the picture if someone doesn't trade with Atlanta. Problem is Atlanta could easily refuse to trade with us, so we are at their mercy to some degree. Also where are all of these people who said QBs wouldn't go as early and often as some of us predicted?
-
It’s grown on me. It has a very Euro soccer team feel to it, makes it different.
-
What if he was good and under 6’, would you pay him then? A good player is a good player, his height might be reason he is good or bad but by itself it doesn’t tell you anything and using it as a singular metric to decide on a player is poor evaluation.
-
I can understand passing on him, but just basing it on height? I guess you would have passed on Revis also?
-
If QB3 goes #3 then going to #5 might be pointless. I could see Atlanta trading down, makes a lot of sense for them, and I don't see them trading down with us. I would be somewhat surprised if 4 QBS went top 4, but if 3 went top 3, I would be nervous as heck with Atlanta's spot. Also you are assuming that the team likes QB 3 or 4 equally. As fans a lot of us would be happy with any of the top 4 QBs, but there is a very good chance that a lot of teams will like one a good bit more than the others. If the team decides they like QB3 that much more than QB4 they just need to go to #3. If you are unwilling to give up the assets to do that, which is a valid argument, than just be patient but you have to be willing to accept the fact there is a chance you won't get any of the top 4 QBs.
-
REPORT: Panthers remain interested in Deshaun Watson trade
AU-panther replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
or they believe he might be not cleared and teams are backing off, so they "leak" information to create the illusion of more interest than there really is. Either way its impossible for fans to know which reports are true and which are smokescreens. -
I found this tweet by Daniel Jeremiah really interesting. Thinking back there definitely seems to be some truth to it. Also it might cause some concern about guys this year. Speaking of red flags, I'm seeing another trend I was hoping wouldn't be continued with this staff. Signing a guy and expecting (and paying him as such) to be better than he has consistently shown in the recent past is a recipe for disaster. We saw it with Kalil and Teddy. Sure seems like we are seeing it again.
-
I could see that, I just don't think there was much substance to, but letting other teams know that Kyle Shanahan thinks highly of your QB might create an illusion that you want to portray. Both NE(before resigning Cam) and WFT seemed to make more sense. I could have seen RR wanting a risk adverse QB, but 49ers just seemd odd. Not sure he offers much more than Jimmy G. Speaking of WFT, with them signing Fitzpatrick that is probably one less possible teams that might want Teddy.
-
True, but they have also had success with 2 TE sets, Hernadez and Gronk, but I do agree it does seem to favor Cam and good for him. I hope they put him in a position to succeed.
-
I'm not convinced the 49er interest in Bridgewater was legit. Seems a bit like news put out to create a market. "If the 49ers are interested maybe we should be also" Don't get me wrong, would love to be true and could be possible, but this time of year you can't believe everything you read.
-
The Free Agent Money is about 1/3 of what it has been
AU-panther replied to MHS831's topic in Carolina Panthers
Just another reason we should have been frugal last year. -
Whether or not his receivers are open is irrelevant. An accurate pass is an accurate pass, doesn't matter if if the CB is 1 foot away or 2 yards away. That is why you don't box score scout. Does he face less pressure than most QBs playing for Alabama? Of course, but I'm sure there is some tape of him facing pressure. Any good scout has the resources to filter out certain plays. Here again this is why you scout by watching film and not the box score or you use advance metrics that can tell you how he actually does under pressure, or how many throws are accurate and just not complete. A player not having to do something isn't the same as a player not being able to do something. Herbert showed that last year with his ability to throw deep which was something he didn't show in college. Throwing to open receivers isn't' a negative by itself, it doesn't prove that he can't make tight window throws, it just limits the amount of tape of him doing so. Personally I haven't watched him enough to know, but hopefully our scouts have.
-
Chris Simms “no way the panthers draft Lance at 8”
AU-panther replied to GoobyPls's topic in Carolina Panthers
Scary part is that Waddle was the better of the two, when they both played, and neither of them might be the first WR drafted. Good year to need a WR if you are drafting early. -
Chris Simms “no way the panthers draft Lance at 8”
AU-panther replied to GoobyPls's topic in Carolina Panthers
So pass on Mahomes? -
That wasn’t what I asked. Do you think Person or Voth were wrong?
-
Did their mind change or was Person just wrong?
-
Nowhere close 16-18m a year is realistic one of the top tackles in the league and expects to be paid as such
-
I'm still a little salty Chinn didn't get DROY!
AU-panther replied to top dawg's topic in Carolina Panthers
If tackle numbers were a true indication of how well a player was playing Boston would still be on the team. Don’t get me wrong, he played great for a rookie, and got a lot of snaps at a lot of different positions, but tackles by themselves are often products of alignment and scheme. -
To everyone saying that that the Saints don't have the cap space: A large part of Wilson's cap number with the Seahawks is dead money from his signing bonus. Any team that trades for him will only be responsible for his salary, which is only $19m. A team like the Saints, who will be close on cap space could convert that $19m to a bonus and drop his 2021 cap hit to about $4m, and the Saints can make that much room.