Jump to content

FuFuLamePoo

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,300

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by FuFuLamePoo

  1. FuFuLamePoo
    Yes, he unquestionably was.
  2. FuFuLamePoo
    Rasul Douglas Mike Davis John Miller Jermaine Carter
  3. FuFuLamePoo
    You just don’t understand it. Like, at all. People who act like WR wasn’t a need are fuging asinine. Robby is gone next year and David Moore is like a #4 at best. Marshall was a first round talent at the end of the second.
  4. FuFuLamePoo
    Yes, that definitely means Surtain is better. Thanks for the hard hitting analysis. I wanted Fields, but Horn is going to be a superstar.
  5. FuFuLamePoo
    I still have no idea what you're trying to argue. Even if he is a bit of a project or whatever that doesn't make it a bad selection at all.
  6. FuFuLamePoo
    I meant David Moore of course, not DJ.
  7. FuFuLamePoo
    Marshall is probably better than Moore already. Even if your point is true, we aren't a contender next year anyways so why does it matter if we had the future in mind when making this pick? E: David Moore, of course.
  8. FuFuLamePoo
    We have two reliable receivers right now. WR was a need.
  9. FuFuLamePoo
    Of course. You literally need like 3-4 good receivers to make a run today.
  10. FuFuLamePoo
    Hurney truly broke fans' brains. How dare the team think one year ahead of time!
  11. FuFuLamePoo
    It's absolutely a need. Can't keep Moore and Robby. David Moore was always just a stopgap. You need a surplus of receivers to compete in today's NFL. I'm glad we're thinking ahead of time for once.
  12. FuFuLamePoo
    How beautiful is this. Two needs already filled tonight with two more picks to go. Do you all want to keep complaining?
  13. FuFuLamePoo
    Who knows how it will translate, but so far this could be shaping up to be my favorite day two we've ever had. The entire process has been phenomenal.
  14. FuFuLamePoo
    Let's go!!!
  15. FuFuLamePoo
    I hope we trade down again.
  16. FuFuLamePoo
    Or, maybe, just maybe, their big board looks different from what these dudes on twitter say.
  17. FuFuLamePoo
    He's not good.
  18. FuFuLamePoo
    SUCK MY DICK HATERS HAHAHHAHAHAH I LOVE IT
  19. FuFuLamePoo
    Welp
  20. FuFuLamePoo
    So you have absolutely no sort of argument to refute this. Even when we had one of the strongest cores in the league (Cam, Luke, Olsen, KK, TD) those teams had a hard time sustaining winning because they lacked depth. I have a guess as to why!!!!
  21. FuFuLamePoo
    Seriously, this poo is not hard to find. Go back and look at the decade and find the teams that trade back the most. Those teams (Ravens, Patriots, Colts, Vikings, Seahawks) CONSISTENTLY have some of the strongest rosters in the league. You guys are arguing against something that literally historically works.
  22. FuFuLamePoo
    Or maybe, and hear me out, maybe all the 16 first round talents we had on our board are already gone and we like a lot of players all in the same range. We now get three of them instead of two.
  23. FuFuLamePoo
    Here we go gotta get the TROOPS involved
  24. FuFuLamePoo
    This is literally what all the best teams do. We just added an extra third tonight. Phenomenal move.
  25. FuFuLamePoo
    I LOVE it
×
×
  • Create New...