Wolfcop

I like him, but I wouldn't give him more than $4M per year. Not going to happen.

I am more fond of this than drafting a QB just to draft one. QBs outside the top 2-3 are huge gambles.

Hey, we could get him back if he gets cut. lol

If this really is inside information, it means they are considering trading him to us...which is actually good news if you are wanting Watson. If they are considering it, Tepper is going to make it hard to say no. If you you really think Bridgewater is going to make a deal fall apart if we give them enough other pieces, then you are fooling yourselves. If they want a QB, there are QBs to be had out there that are better than TB that they can get for one of the picks we send them.

The questions of his accuracy concern me. He intrigues me, but not enough give up a lot of assets to trade up to draft. If we do not get Watson, I am ok sitting at 8 and going best QB or BPA. That may be the best answer long term.

Lance intrigues me, but he is obviously far from a sure things.

I would pay him to be a rotational guy if he is willing to do that. No more

As awesome as it would be to get Watson, I agree with this post. 3 firsts...maybe 1 player, but anything beyond that....nope.

If it's close, I would be willing to bet he gets traded to an NFC team.

Congrats if you really did stop drinking, man.

Hmmm, might be on to something there. LOL

I feel that the Panthers have a real chance to get this done (if the Texans are willing), but they can't half-azz an offer and stay in contention.

If Sam Howell is our savior, we are in trouble.

Their demands will drop when they come to the realization that Watson is not going to ever play for them again. Its still early in this process. They will need the draft picks they are getting in return to start building for the future.

I love CMC, but if parting with him brings us a proven franchise QB, make it happen.

Need a strong center to take this team to the next level.

I think jumping to 5th is about as high as we need to go. That cost would be enough. More than that is too much IMO. Heck Mahommes was picked 10th and a lot of flops were picked in the top 5. You just never know and I don't want to sell the farm for 1 player. If I am considering that, it would only be for a proven player like Watson. Even then, I'm iffy.

Sorry if this has already been mentioned, but I just read an ESPN+ article where 4/9 NFL Insiders predicted the Panthers will land Watson. The only other team to get more than 1 nod for Watson was the 49ers with 2.

If Watson refuses to play for them, they will trade him. Its February folks.

Don't know if I'd take Lance over Fields. Fields looked awesome against Clemson.

EX-actly. That loss doesn't help, but I wouldn't hire him regardless. Not until he starts actually calling plays.

Person is doing a great job at the Athletic

I just get the feeling the Panthers are on his nice list. Whether they ever get a real shot to land him remains to be seen.

I would not give away any 1st for any QB older than mid-20's. We are building for the future.

Article in the Athletic today where the writer does not think Jones will be taken by the Panthers that high. Inside sources were not impressed with any of the Sr Bowl QBs.