Snake

Yeah a HOF offensive guru. I think it says a lot about Winston and thats about it. Two coaches choosing someone else over him.

And yet he started over Winston last year and is starting over him this year. So what does that exactly say about Winston if this is true?

What most threads devolve to.

Hill is simply a better QB than Winston. Winston is no more a backup at this point.

CMC IMO wasn't simply because he's a great WR that can run the rock. He's simply a imposing player on the field. With that said pretty much any other RB isn't worth it in this NFL. Case and point Saquon Barkley.

Honestly there probably isn't a better Rush Duo in the nfl. Both are probably going to get paid next year.

Probably a high draft pick and new QB next year.

A bunch would have to go right.

Yeah extending guys like Burns,Moore,and maybe Anderson would be great.

You should know anything can be spun and about 60% of South Carolina is Clemson Fans right now and they don't care. They will fill the seats with Clemson jerseys.

Why would we make a move if he's doing good? Probably better not giving up 4 first round picks.

This right here.

You are having some kind of assumption 1. That 1k yards is a lot in this NFL and two one injury season from CMC is the wheels falling off. Both are hyperbole.

We are so close boys and girls.

He's probably the most dynamic player in the NFL. He's not going to get pulled off the field too much. Probably in two or three years he will be more of a pass catcher than a production back though. Also Mike Davis was as ordinary as it comes in the NFL. So ordinary we didn't even offer him a contract. Chuba is a better back right now than Davis is and Hubbard could actually turn into a really dangerous weapon with his speed.

Well there is going to be no argument that probably for the next 3 years CMC is the most dynamic weapon in the NFL. Its hard to take him off the field because the defense has to commit two players two him. A LB for the outside run and a safety for the passing game. I'm not knocking Chuba. He's a great runner but his fall was because he isn't the best pass catcher. So its really hard to take CMC off the field because he's so dynamic. I would say in three years though CMC will probably not be as much of a runner as he will be a pass catcher and running will go to another back.

That was 3 games. Let's be frank you're not putting CMC on the bench right now for Chuba. He will probably spell him 30% if that much. Still in two years that number will probably be closer to 40% or more.

Pressure is all nice and good but a Sack is a tackle for loss and is why its so important. Give me an line that causes sacks and TFL and I will show you a great defense. Give me a line that gets pressures and hurried throws and I will show you an average defensive line.

I mean probably states you play a player 100% of the time for years they are going to get hurt but Rivera was horrible at over using players. Having a talented back behind CMC is a good thing no matter how you use him. I also think Rhule is 100% better at player usage than Rivera was.

Having a talented back behind CMC is nothing but good. Rivera used him way too much. He's probably the most dangerous weapon in the NFL but that doesn't mean he needs to be smashing himself for 3rd and 1s all game.

Its possible but if we were tanking we probably should have tanked that Washington game. I really think its probably they were not willing to push a player for nothing or allow a player to push himself for future injuries.

Fitters doing his damn thing

From reports they really were not very sold on them. Even tepper was really wanting line so it must not have been a good class in their eyes. Time will tell.

Thats what most people think but he is a work horse back and you dont pick RB at 13 anymore unless your name is marty hurney.

I mean CMC has been pretty healthy. So thats really not an issue in my mind but I think picking up Chuba will definitely help with the wear and tear of the season.