heel31ok

great song...

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

To cteanalogy, you're only ated three  items and you alread y  have a Chicken Kiev and a Leg of Lamb on your plate, yet you still order the four hamburgers knowing that you won't even get to eat three of them anyway.

I'm hungry now.

That changes that analogy...it would fIt if the if the burgers came with the meal so You sent the lamb back to make iT certain you Get The burgers because you like them better.

But in the real world teams can bring in more and drop who they dont Want or need...more chances  to get v Better Players...

32 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Heel would rather have 4 hamburgers than one filet mignon.

Id Take all ...

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Only 53 guys make the final roster, a nd most of  those will be players returning from last year.

When there are only a few spots available, getting the best players you can for those spots is true "common sense".

Yes and extra picks v give More chances and better Chances to fInd the best players...limited roster spots dont Really matter if you find a better player ...you keep the better players.Thats LiFe and the business side of the NFL...

You could have chosen anyone...reluctance to pick ,no wonder you don't get it...

23 minutes ago, Nick_81 said:

Anyone who matters?  Then no...

According to who...

15 minutes ago, Nick_81 said:

According to who?

Your choice...

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

S the draft tthe quality os play ers avai lable gets lower. 

The equation is simple: One good player and two who won't make the roster means you wind up with one good player. Packaging the picks means you don't waste your time on two guys who weren't going to make it anyway and you wind up with one great player.

It's not hard to understand.

You dont Lose anything with the extra pick and with thev great Talent evaluation you have more opportunity to improve...thats Not hard to understand...well u It shouldn't Be...

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As the draft goes on, the quality of the players available gets lower.

The equation is simple: One good player and two who won't make the roster means you wind up with one good player. Packaging the picks means you don't waste your time on two guys who weren't going to make it anyway and you wind up with one great player.

It's not hard to understand.

Oh, so We got iOur Licks in early and that makes the choice better or great even...the timing iOf the pick is the key if we took the same players later it would not have been As good a pick...

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually his 'wasted resources' comment xactly right.

The choice woul d be between using three draft picks to get one good player and two who won't make it out of camp versus trading away the two lower picks to move up and get a great player.

That's smart management, and smart teams do it all the time.

So There were no iOther Players as good available? Very unlikely...we reached, which makes the pt Of less to get more invalid...

2 hours ago, beckersteen said:

Not keeping who you bring in is wasted resources. You could, say, use that resource to move up in the draft and choose someone you actually really want. He is content at DE and didn't think the rookies available would have any more impact than someone we already have. It wasn't valuable. 

Sorry but no.the very nature of the business of the NFL makes your wasted resourcev theory Unrealistic...the wasted resource would be not making more picks when you have the gold standard making the picks...every team brings in more prospectsvwhich give more opportunity to improve with little or no b downside ...

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually it's also about the number of spots available on the roster.

The reason why we traded up last year was because we didn't have room for nine rookies on an already crowded roster.

Same situation applies this year.

Someone with team building experience knows that.

at least you give a logical answer without making crap up...  the conclusion then is there were no other prospects who could improve the team enough to win a spot ? Or maybe GMAN  didn't want to make changes at certain spots? that could be true but it is also true that you don't have to keep everybody you bring in.

1 hour ago, tiger7_88 said:

So in your professional football opinion, there have been no good professional talent evaluators in the NFL since the beginning of NFL time since picks have ALWAYS been traded for other draft picks in this league.

That is the logical conclusion to what you are saying, right? That heel31ok has discovered the ULTIMATE secret to the NFL Draft Code that *no* other professional football draft evaluator has ever been able to crack? 

so are you auditioning for new dem press secretary? try to stay on subject without making up new premises that don't exist in the context of the subject...you and Bogart must we study buddies...

1 hour ago, Bogart said:

Are you like mentally challenged or something?  The probability is good you have no clue how to build a football team and trying to scream nana nana boo boo with incoherent bullshit doesn't help your case.

which has zero to do with what i said... no one screamed nana nana boo boo! and the incoherence you experience is more likely on your end not mine.But keep swinging you may hit something eventually.

Hey probabilities...Bogart wants to see your resume...

So Gman couldn't do better with more picks...? 

Just now, Bogart said:

Of which you obviously have none.  I award you no points and may God have mercy on you.  

Just now, Bogart said:

Of which you obviously have none.  I award you no points and may God have mercy on you.  

Nice talKjing To ya...

4 minutes ago, Bogart said:

That's what you're going with?  How much scouting experience d o  you have again?  I must have missed reading your resume.

Thats All i Need for this issue...i Dont Need  any experience to know the more someone does what they r Good at the more good comes from it...not really about me...iTs abiut Common sense...

9 minutes ago, Bogart said:

According to who? 

Common sense and probabilities...whats Hard about that...