heel31ok

well I lied...sue me

last one for today...love this

one of greatest bands ever...

great song...

That changes that analogy...it would fIt if the if the burgers came with the meal so You sent the lamb back to make iT certain you Get The burgers because you like them better. But in the real world teams can bring in more and drop who they dont Want or need...more chances to get v Better Players...

Id Take all ...

Yes and extra picks v give More chances and better Chances to fInd the best players...limited roster spots dont Really matter if you find a better player ...you keep the better players.Thats LiFe and the business side of the NFL...

You could have chosen anyone...reluctance to pick ,no wonder you don't get it...

According to who...

Your choice...

You dont Lose anything with the extra pick and with thev great Talent evaluation you have more opportunity to improve...thats Not hard to understand...well u It shouldn't Be...

Oh, so We got iOur Licks in early and that makes the choice better or great even...the timing iOf the pick is the key if we took the same players later it would not have been As good a pick...

So There were no iOther Players as good available? Very unlikely...we reached, which makes the pt Of less to get more invalid...

Sorry but no.the very nature of the business of the NFL makes your wasted resourcev theory Unrealistic...the wasted resource would be not making more picks when you have the gold standard making the picks...every team brings in more prospectsvwhich give more opportunity to improve with little or no b downside ...

at least you give a logical answer without making crap up... the conclusion then is there were no other prospects who could improve the team enough to win a spot ? Or maybe GMAN didn't want to make changes at certain spots? that could be true but it is also true that you don't have to keep everybody you bring in.