Jump to content

heel31ok

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    13,881
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by heel31ok

  1. that would only make sense if we bypassed a Heel in the first that all of us wanted.which is not the case.
  2. you may well suck as a gm but that site should not be your basis for the conclusion.
  3. that's why the hedging of "BPA according to need". BPA is inherent in the picks, if they didn't think it was the best pick they wouldn't do it.
  4. that doesn't excuse not drafting a OT at all as there was still talent available and the result was we pretty much sucked at OT the whole year.
  5. why, who played these roles before 2000?
  6. it's all about ratio, it will depend on Harper,Decoud,Tiguewood, Bell, Williams,and the like and who they decide to go in with.
  7. the only difference is 93 t-bird was never a good car.
  8. or you could do what is in your control and not read it.
  9. Boom goes the dynamite! Now there you whiners shut up and quit ruining my life....wait...who?
  10. absolutely correct, I am in no way suggesting Bersin as a primary.
  11. but both are 2 steps ahead of you... but in your mind that makes you close.
  12. he gets partial credit for being with the Giants.
  13. we could still bring in one of those guys and keep Bersin. I don't see that as the biggest issue holding us back.
  14. that really puts a bad light on all the other rookie classes we have had. Probably would have to go with 2001.
×
×
  • Create New...