t96

LeChoke.

Both teams are historically bad Finals teams.

Cleveland is only in this Finals because of Tristan Thompson. He's more valuable to them than LeBron.

​Yes it will.

Glad Philly isn't on the list. Not that he wouldn't be better than some of the other guys, but I want to see him focus all of his attention on wideout 100%, so when he wins that #3 spot on the depth chart he can be even better than if he was also returning. Funch in the slot with Philly and KB outside will be beautiful to see.

​I think he will too, but I think it'll be because the Colts will be in no rush to extend him since they have the 5th year option. Wilson does not, so his will come first and Luck's agents will want to top that. If Luck's comes first, Wilson's agents will want to top it by arguing he won a Super Bowl and got them to another. So whoever signs first will make less. May be a power struggle by the agents to get more and they'll end up having some complications and franchise tagging, etc. I'd love to see that.

Since this thread basically went down the gutter, I'll save it by making a better question out of the thread title... Who is going to get paid more? Wilson or Luck?

Luke will take less and sign for 10 years $75M, $30M guaranteed.

​PIE'd this. Then un-PIE'd when I realized that we're neck and neck.

This isn't a communist board.

Where do you find all the details per year, and guaranteed, etc.? I think that $30M or whatever it is will be in 2016 right? Trying to figure this out but kind find the structure information.

​Got a head start on this post... ;)

​That's how it's structured. But if he sees all of the money in the contract over the next 6 years he'll have made $118.47M. Divided by 6 is $19.75M/year. What he's making this year is irrelevant.

http://blackandbluereview.com/numbers-to-know-about-cam-newtons-upcoming-contract/ They can structure it different ways by adding some guaranteed money this year but that's essentially what he's making over the 6 years.

​It's an extension. He'll make $14.67 million next season on the 5th year option and the extension starts after that. So 14.67 + 103.8 = 118.47. Divide that by the 6 years total and it comes out to $19.75M/year. Not entirely sure how the guaranteed works since the structure hasn't come out yet, but that should be available soon.

The Huddle needs to start a fund to get surveillance on Nicole Holder. Don't want that $30M on the exempt list.

So he's basically making $19.75M/year over 6 years with $60M guaranteed. That is an insanely good contract for us. Wilson and Luck will probably be making $25M/year with equal or more guaranteed. I absolutely love this contract.

​I honestly didn't read your post closely enough to try to comprehend it, so I don't remember. I was just making a joke.

Well Voth basically just said it's not happening today...

How do I give someone the square root of negative pie rep?

Those are some pretty damn big words. Atleast 75% of Huddlers won't know what they mean. Including myself.

Won't let me neg rep Jeremy... What kind of establishment you running here Mussolini?

​During practice?

Exactly why you shouldn't use wins as a metric for comparison between individual players. Not even mentioning the other players on the player's own team who contribute to either a win or a loss. It's just silly. "Brady's the best he won 4 Super Bowls" "Wilson is better than Luck and Cam he has a Super Bowl win" "Flacco deserves $20M/year, he won a Super Bowl" "The Golden Calf of Bristol should be in the NFL all he does is win. He has as many playoff wins as Matt Ryan and Cam Newton" It's absolutely ridiculous.

​I assume Graham.