Servant of Cthululelei

Oh damn, I coulda sworn we had signed him to a two-year deal. Guess it makes sense why no one has been mentioning him on our CB depth chart.

Nobody has mentioned him in awhile, but isn't Charles Tillman still technically on the team and not yet retired? I mean I imagine his ACL tear being so late in the year means he wouldn't be ready week 1, but he'd probably be good to go partway through the season, yes?

I don't know this is necessarily true, seeing as the Seachickens have an altogether much tougher division than we do. They didn't win it last year and are likely not the favorites this year either.

Not saying you're necessarily wrong, but the idea of not picking a guy because "the gap between him and the next best is not very big" is generally a flawed position to take. It completely discounts the scouting process. Every draft expert in the world could agree that the No.1 , No. 2, and No.3 Tight Ends in the draft have basically the same value, but our team may rank one of them as a first round grade and the others as a second or third based on OUR own scouts' evaluation. Our scouts know specifically what we're looking for. Fans and draft experts don't. Basically, I just don't believe that there are ever two guys that are truly interchangeable, even if they have the same overall "talent" level.

While Jonathan Stewart has been an integral part of our run game this season, I think we'll find that if defenses stop regularly stacking the box against us, the read-option elements of our run game can really take over. I'd like to see what CAP can do as the lead back though, as I don't know how much familiarity Fozzy has with running read-option. CAP ran plenty of it in college.

It almost certainly is. Whenever I see it hanging, it's waiting for a response from some sort of ad URL. There are 8 ads on this page alone as I type this. But hey, I'm not complaining. This place is awesome and free. I just feel for people who work at places that monitor their web traffic. They probably have to be really careful about how much huddling they do.

Yo are we gonna internet fight these fools? They better be scared, I'm a fuging keyboard WARRIOR.

Good poo, though I'm curious as to what the hell "impressively desperate throws" look like.

Booooooo. We don't need to lose to win. Haven't yet, don't need to going forward.

Packers, Colts, Eagles all run 3-4 schemes. Our offense did not struggle at all in any of those games. Those struggles were due to a really poor offensive line. No need to worry about that anymore.

Pretty sure that's purposefully not implemented to generate a few extra accidental page hits and ad clicks. Considering this site is still free for those that want it to be, I don't have a problem with it.

He was saying if they started 2-4, they would still need at least 10 overall wins to get into the playoffs, which only affords them the ability to lose 2 more games.

I think only a little bit is due to Stewart. Like 1 in 3 runs for < 2 yard gain he might be missing a small hole he could have run through. But for the most part it's just not there. The line is just a big jumble of bodies with no real holes opening up. Some RBs would bounce the ball outside every time they see that, and who knows...maybe that would be more successful for us right now. But that's not Stewart's game and I don't think it's the game our coaching staff wants from their RBs. That style requires good run blocking WRs (we don't have those), and gives you a much higher percentage of truly negative running plays. Those are drive killers for this offense.

So....is "Camp MVP" the kiss of death for our team now? Last year it was Frank Alexander and he missed almost all of the season (granted that was his own fault) and this year KB is gonna miss the WHOLE season. Can we start naming opposing players as our camp MVP?

Are we gonna win the Superbowl, Gil? I truly don't know. But...