-
Posts
266 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Billy Goat
-
Why does she care so much about this situation?
-
Mike Kaye: Panthers going after starting C
Billy Goat replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
What would this mean for Bozeman? Do they cut him, keep him as a backup or move him to LG (where he played for the Ravens for two seasons)? -
Seattle got a 1st and 2nd for Frank Clark not too long ago and he was given $105m over 5 years. The salary cap has increased by $70m since then as well. That "league source" should put down the crack pipe.
-
Carolina Panthers will have trouble building roster for 2024
Billy Goat replied to jayboogieman's topic in Carolina Panthers
This guy thinks getting $50,000 from cutting Hurst was done to get some more cap room to extend Burns? -
Personally I think it's more likely a team competing to win will offer him a deal we are not prepared to match and a trade gets done for less than two 1sts.
-
That panthersontap tweet isn't accurate. Off the top of my head I can remember Seahawks trading Frank Clark after putting the non-exclusive tag on him. There's probably lots more.
-
Yes that's the other side to this. Really you want to know what you're doing with Burns before free agency. It would be foolish to tag him not knowing if you're going to trade, extend him or let him play under the tag. Before you know it you get to training camp and have no new pass rusher and Burns holding out
-
Tag and trade looking the most likely scenario at this point. Maybe they liked what they heard from some interested teams at the combine?
-
Panthers current Free Agents
Billy Goat replied to Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.'s topic in Carolina Panthers
There's only two players on that list you'd absolutely want to keep. -
-
Just remembered they traded for Darnold the year before Purdy's draft. He still managed to draft a QB in round 3 that year, couldn't get them to use a 7th rounder on Purdy but could get a crappy CB from Baylor? Yeah right....Then after the draft he could get them to waste more draft capital on Mayfield. Sounds legit.
-
Just watched the soundbite. I noticed he also had to mention that he told his players not to jump on his pump fake and they all did and Rhule did his little "I told you so". The guy is an absolute slime ball. If he was made of chocolate he'd eat himself. Maybe he did say Purdy should be on the board but that doesn't men he would've drafted him. He traded away 3 picks for Darnold before the draft even got going.
-
Most players at that stage of their career signing their first big contract will go to whoever writes the biggest cheque, so there's always a chance. I doubt he becomes a FA though.
-
Doesn't the whole lateral move thing make that pretty much a non-starter? Most teams with good coaches under contract aren't going to willingly let them walk out the door if they don't have to.
-
Not really fussed about the structure. It's fairly common across all sports. The Kroenke's own my football (soccer) team and the manager and sporting director report directly to Josh Kroenke but he just writes the cheques and lets them get on with it. That's what Tepper needs to do. What's gone before doesn't fill you with hope but there's always a chance he changes.
-
Canales.
-
Didnt realise it was behind a paywall. Fowler: I'm hearing the Panthers have four or five candidates they are really high on. One is Buccaneers offensive coordinator Dave Canales, who interviewed Wednesday afternoon in Charlotte. Canales' offense caught fire late in the season, his work with quarterbacks is strong, and he learned under Carroll for 13 years. The word is owner David Tepper is also intrigued by Ravens offensive coordinator Todd Monken, who is eligible to interview after this week. Evero -- the in-house candidate -- interviewed twice, and Carolina has long targeted Ben Johnson, though I haven't heard much momentum there at this point. He's going to have options. What's funny, Dan, is that new Titans coach Brian Callahan had some traction in Carolina. He was set to interview there Tuesday, so Callahan agreeing to terms with Tennessee on Monday night probably sent waves through Carolina's building. Graziano: Indeed, I had Callahan to the Panthers in the predictions file I wrote last week. But the Titans zeroed in on him early and moved quickly to get him on Monday night while he still had plans to visit Carolina and Atlanta in the ensuing days. Again, the offensive coordinator pool is a shallow one this year, and if the Panthers are focused on an offensive coach and can't get Ben Johnson, Canales could have the inside track at this point. But if newly promoted GM Dan Morgan can convince Tepper to consider candidates other than offensive coordinators, I think the search becomes very interesting. For example, Vrabel is set to interview there Thursday. Surely, Vrabel could help anybody, even though he's not an offensive playcaller. Fowler: Vrabel could be a wild card here. The word is Tepper values leadership big-time -- it's not just about improving the unsightly offense, though that's a key component. Vrabel has been lurking throughout the process and could pop up as a prime candidate somewhere. He would need to work in lockstep with Morgan, and there are questions, fair or not, about Vrabel's ability to do that after Tennessee switched GMs in early 2023 and Vrabel was gone a year later.
-
Following a similar theme i feel like it won't be Evero. I think they keep him as DC an extra year and get a comp pick for him when someone inevitably makes him a HC down the line.
-
I wonder how they play it? He's probably top of the list behind Johnson but with Johnson being the hot name and top choice for other teams do they interview Canales and keep him waiting until they see what Johnson does, or bite the bullet and hire him this week knowing Johnson likely goes elsewhere? There's a risk if you make it obvious to Canales that he's the consolation prize that he just stays in Tampa for that extra year of experience.
-
Washington is the place to go for any of these HC candidates. You'll have your pick of the top QBs in the draft and almost 6 picks in the top 100.
-
He's not a name that appears on a list of people interviewing for GM spots around the league, so I don't see why we should give him any serious consideration. Sure it may be unfair associating him with what may not have been his failures, but he's tainted by how bad the team has been. Best thing for him would be a sideways move to be assistant GM on another team and try and build up his rep somewhere else.