CarolinaCoolin

When peppers left we proceeded to becoming the worst team in the NFL the next year. Hardly being "fine" but hey whatever logical gymnastics you have to do right?

Explain how this is relevant to understanding anything people are talking about in this thread? Oh wait, you can't. Because when someone makes you look stupid you try to throw your money around. Same as in the TB. You're pathetic.

It's no surprise your simple mind can't grasp what I'm trying to get across. Enjoy playing with you toys and drinking out of your sippie cup.

Telling me you are going to ignore just so you can get the last word in lol How do you make the laughing emoticon again scot? You would know right?

I think they were spot on. Your arguments are weak and rifle with arrogance. Rather admit you've been wrong about the Hardy situation since the beginning you back track and change arguments. But whatever since I'm boring why don't you just block me since you are so above it all

The whole thing of them "choosing" to be put on that list is so the NFL has their ass covered legally when they impose a suspension with pay on these players. It's purely to cover their ass not because the player has any actual choice. It's all what they can legally get away with. NFL has clearly been making it up as they go along and luckily for them you have a majority of fans willing to carry their water for them and be complicit in ignorance

Changing your arguments when you are proven wrong makes you look weak af. Your whole argument has been the NFL doesn't need proof to suspend Hardy. Him simply being in legal trouble is enough for them to suspend him. Since he's a PR nightmare with DV they can suspend him. Now you are trying to say you never said that. You are the douchebag. You think your opinions are facts and you talk down to people cause you have dorky ass 'never will get you anywhere' football knowledge and you can copy and paste a link. And I personally enjoy calling you out and watching you try to play it off like you are some god. GTFO But have fun in your huddle ivory tower with all your useless football factoids. I hope that keeps you warm at night

Is it though? Both would be losing time they can never replace but are getting paid for it. Apparently that's all the huddle needs to not see it as a punishment. All igo needs is to get paid to not be around his wife and kids. "Sounds like a paid vacation to me har har har"

Nah the argument is if you get paid it isn't a punishment. Everyone else is arguing losing time isn't the punishment. This is to clearly demonstrate that Hardy was punished with losing time he can never get back. It's funny that YOU are the one talking about terrible logic. That's your bread and butter

You're a parent right? You don't get to see your wife and kids grow up for an entire year. An entire year of precious time with them is taken away from you. During that time you'll get paid though. Is that punishment? If you say no you should show that to your wife and kids.

4 or 5 in so far. Fake Putin is a true gamer. Took all of today off so I can go all the way through. You guys are in for a treat

Not even remotely the same thing but nice try. How about You are one of the best on the planet at your specific job but only have 'x' number of years to be at the top level of this job and can only get paid in that amount of time. And before you are allowed market yourself to cash in on potentially the only pay day you could ever earn which will have to last your the rest of your life you are told you are suspended indefinitely but will receive payment only for that year. Does that sound like a vacation? That sounds like a getting pissed on and being told its rain.

Show me the precedent in which players have been punished for just being accused on their first offense

Can you prove he paid her off besides citing the prosecution who hadn't been able to track her down following the first trial? No you can't. The charges were dismissed. The prosecution didn't even have a case. In the eyes of the law he's been innocent since day one. You are trying so hard man smh

Except that's not what you said at all in any of your post in the numerous threads devoted to the topic. Something to the affect of "who ever thinks the courts are going to save Hardy are wrong, the NFL can do whatever they want" obviously I'm paraphrasing and if I wasn't at work I'd go back and multi quote every post in which you argue for this. There are quite a lot of them. Never once did you argue for motivation. You argued that rice situation is why Hardy will get suspended 6 or more games. Pro tip: don't try to change your argument half way through like you have been doing all today since the judge ruling against the NFL. It makes you look weak. Or you know you can so I can have the best laughs when I call you out on it.

If he wasn't in NC he wouldn't have had a bench trial guilty verdict so your whole argument falls flat on its face. You might be one of the worst posters. Consistently showing your ass in the offseason smh

How have they convinced you? Scots whole argument is that Hardy is an image problem for the NFL so that gives them the power to suspend Hardy for as long as they want and no one can stop them. That's wrong and I look forward to watching the NFL release a statement Hardy won't be punished. The judge ruling the NFL can't retroactively punish these guys is further proof of that. But yeah defenders of Hardy are coming from "a place of emotion and no logic" apparently See Jeremy and scots arguments are flawed in the sense they are arguing from what they think the NFL will do versus what they actually can do. Scot arguing that the NFL will give Hardy more than two games because that's what rice got so they won't want a PR nightmare like before but they can't do that as seen by this ruling that they can't retroactively discipline these guys. So now it comes down to the old policy. 2 games max and since he is a first timer and the charges were dismissed you get Hardy walking away from this missing an entire season over an unfair media witch hunt. I'm struggling to see how this side of the argument is emotion based. That's all

Damn all these Hardy defenders are SOOOOO emotional!!! Can't they see that even though Hardy wasn't found guilty and the NFL can't make up rules as they go along they can do whatever they want and no one can say anything?! Geez NFL doesn't care about what's right or fair. Sike. Teeray has been calling it from the beginning. They aren't going to be able to do much to Hardy. They can't pull things out of their ass. It will go to a judge and be slapped down.

Counting all the udfas hes been money. Harper Mitchell Ginn Remmers Norwell Brown All solid guys who contributed to playoff berths and fit what we needed them to do for cheap. Free agency record has probably been just as solid given the little amount of money he had to work with

As long as ginn is only brought back to return punts and kick offs. He's a soft receiver. I'd rather draft another top receiver and continue developing Corey brown.

Whatchu talkin bout Willis? everything I post is gold.

Lets not forget ginn is soft as fug. I'd rather have Moore if the option is between the two

Cam getting paid and the team not getting cap fugged are not mutually exclusive ideas. Both can and will happen. Everyone needs to take a page out of Rodgers book and .......R-E-L-A-X

Thing is the media didn't ask them. THEY went to JR to lobby for Hardy. The COACH is lobbying the FO for Hardy. What does that tell you?

The exempt list is the way of the NFL sitting you without getting in trouble for it. The only way they could legally do this is to pay the guy they are sidelining indefinitely. It is very much a suspension though until your legal troubles are taken care of but that's were they are running a slippery slope. Because they feel they have to get Hardy but Hardy is in the position were he has the upper hand with the charges being dropped. Whatever the NFL does there will be backlash but I hope they don't go down the path which tries to suspend an innocent man twice