saX man

This year's offensive line class is really good. Really damn good. I think 5 first rounders. 9-11 in the top-50. But what I can't get past is that it's rather undersized; even the top talents. Fit mentioned how important size is and gotta say, I do wonder how it's swayed our opinions on some of these guys. Notable League-starter LTs: Wirfs: 34" Bahktiari: 34" Trent W: 34.5" Duane Brown: 34.25" Whitworth: 35" Dion Dawkins: 35" Hell, Moton: 34.13" Draft Prospects: There are 3 total LT prospects even over the typical 34" threshold: Darrisaw (34.5"), Leatherwood (34.4), & Spencer Brown (34). Darrisaw is the one true LT prospect IMO. Notable shortees: Penei Sewell: 33.25" Rashawn Slater: 33.00" Teven Jenkins: 32.88" Jalen Mayfield: 32.63" Liam Eichenberg: 32.35" Samuel Cosmi: 33.00" Dillon Radunz: 33.28" -- I'm not intending to throw shade as all 7 of my shortlist are really awesome talents and there are no doubt exceptions to the rule like Jason Peters. However, given what we've heard, I'm curious to who we like the most. Wonder if Darrisaw (who draws Okung comparisons) is viewed highly and could be a trade down target. I don't believe arms length to be make or break but a lot of teams deem it critical on the LT criteria list. This draft has GREAT OL talent, and we better capitalize, but IMO, last year's was superb and this years is slightly behind. Whatsayyou? How important is arm length? Does it warrant pause even if they look like absolute brick walls on tape? I mean, in Slater's case, this is even in the face of Chase Young last year, really controlled the dude.

I don't think a QB after Wilson & Lawrence warranted us to aggressively trade up therefore, we targeted guys like Stafford, Watson, and eventually Darnold. Doesn't mean we don't take on if he falls to us at #8. If we don't land one, I think we exersize the option. This Thursday gon' be funnnn

Agreed with that. A studly top-15ish. Then a very large second tier that goes to almost round 3 quantity wise/top-60. Then a big tier drop. I could see a R2 or R3 trade up. I know they want to gain picks but it's a good draft to capitalize in the 2nd/3rd.

I like him more than Deshon Kizer, I mean, Kellen Mond.

It all depends on how far down and who's available at 8. This type of thing is impossible to really know with team's keeping their boards close to the chest. Unpopular opion but I like Eichenberg more than Darrisaw. If we trade into the teens, there's going to be other positional talent of value as well. I caution everyone that Seattle has always tended to take some picks that no one expected at the time (Brooks, Collier, even Clark was deemed a stretch for them in the 2nd). Anticipate picks that we may feel are reaches that really aren't.

Love how well they played it off like a Hot Ones episode. Noice!

A very very good talent will be there in the 2nd for us. I'm just as excited about that as our first.

David Moore impressed Rhule at the Senior Bowl so we got as close of a look as you can get. Could be a R3-4 get for us. I also LOVE Jermar Jackson out of Oregon State at RB.

An article from a TEN site advising they bring him back: https://www.musiccitymiracles.com/2021/3/3/22294712/titans-free-agent-spotlight-dl-daquan-jones

Wow. Great late signing. He's been consistent for his career and a team guy. He didn't hop around. He doesn't get sacks but our run game just got bolstered in a major way with two guys warranting double teams in the middle. Saucy.

@Verge You think Miami landing Pitts makes Mike Gesicki available? He's a guy that could crank it up to a Kittle/Kelce level next year.

Yep, like I said two posts prior and plenty elsewhere you snarky elder.

A random thought but I wouldn't be opposed to targeting Eichenburg in a trade-up if Fields falls to us. Then trade down in the 3rd to gain lost picks. Between Mayfield, Eichenburg, Cosmi, and Radunz, there is some really promising OT talent with our second pick.

I wouldn't overlook Arthur Smith's interest in Pitts. ATL is the wildcard. TOTALLY agree DET is the likely trade down team and CIN goes Chase. For Miami, with Pitts gone, I see them targeting Waddle. They need a playmaker to pair with Tua and see what he's got. Their trade back up was to ensure a top-3 playmaker. Even with my counter points, we are still looking at Sewell, Slater, all CBs, Smith WR, and maybe the last remaining R1 QB. Sewell could very well happen for us.

I will reserve judgement until this settles (if it even does) but some interesting notes: -Only 2 lawsuits claim forced sexual incidents took place -Of the 2 that were sexual in nature, for 1 (the lesbian therapist), Watson's attorneys pose that they have damning receipt-based evidence (or) other people providing information counter to her filings. -One showed up at his door unannounced to give him an extra massage -Another would text & offer him to a massage after his games -Still though, it doesn't mean this is all a farce. He very well may have crossed the lines from a professional standpoint and furthermore, clearly has a porn-inspired massage fetish. I think the snowballing of cases could lead this to backfire on the plaintiffs and the legitimate ones may get lumped in with the false ones.

I would do go for Newman in the 4th-5th but that's about it. Mond just bugs me. He is super reminiscent of Kizer. Mills, I don't know. Just don't know much about him but when I looked into his shtick, it seems he just throws a TON of uncatchable balls. Newman is the one that interests me. Before he opted out, people were looking at him making a trajectory to a top pick before we really thought of Jones and Wilson so highly. Lawrence, Fields, & Lance were always in that discussion with Purdy and Newman really being the guys teams were thinking could make a leap. Furthermore, that wake offense, ehh doesn't really allow for skills to shine depending on the position. For Newman, yeah, I'd take a gander. We could already have Slater-Leathorwood-Samuel Jr. type situation before we even gamble on a QB. I'm game for it.

Lot's of hogs in the draft pile. Accumulate we shall.

Yep, they've been clear they were intent on being active this free agency and filled the roster to allow for BPA come draft day. That could very well be Fields or Lance. Just like it could be Slater, Sewell, Pitts, & Horn. I think they would take Pitts over both but I'd be interested to see how they stack up the 2 QBs, Horn & the OTs

There's a really weird indirect defensiveness of Teddy by some in the red, with plenty of posts, that is just hilarious. Let us not spend so much energy responding. The dude is gone. He's outta here. Insignificato. Beta bologne. A silly muted man who can't make it into the premier Finnish sauna. He gets directed to the mud baths in Denmark. Yes, it's easy to bash someone online, but he just irks the nerves in such a irritating way. Goodbye Theodore. You will not be missed. You are slightly behind Rodney Peete and ahead of Matt Moore in our history of QBs.

Just because we didn't use Thomas doesn't mean we won't use a TE. We had 1 year so far with this spread offense. And Pitts isn't quite a TE. He can line up slot and at X

Agree with this. This isn't a super deep draft like last year but there's a larger second tier than usual. I think this is also why we wanted to keep our 3rd and 4th rounders this year. We could trade up into the 2nd after that first second rounder. Could land a starting OT, OG, and CB pretty instantly this year. 1-8: Slater OT/OG 2-8: Mayfield/Cosmi OT/OG 2-Trade: Samuel Jr./Adebo CB

If we're cutting him we're rolling with Walker and using that $ elsewhere. Maybe we land Mond or Mills, but meh. Most backups are 1-5 mil/yr so we're actually saving a fair amount even though we eat dead money. For me--I'd rather roll with Darnold+Walker and no TB with 7.95 mil to spend than Darnold, 23 mil towards a backup, & no extra savings.