Jump to content

Swaggasaurus

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,195

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Swaggasaurus

  • Birthday 07/31/1988

Recent Profile Visitors

13,246 profile views

Swaggasaurus's Achievements

Rising Star

Rising Star (9/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

1.4k

Reputation

  1. Swaggasaurus
    Walker has some extra bust potential. Every time someone brings up limited stats, the other side says “but he had limited snaps.” I don’t like that. I’d have a true impact player on the field as much as possible, don’t matter if it’s at Georgia or Catawba. He’s got some stuff that protects him too, intangibles, leadership, tenacity, he plays hard. Still, if we are at 8 and he’s on the board, with no trade out scenario, I probably pick him.
  2. Swaggasaurus
    Been saying Walker is a 3-4 OLB. He has ZERO value as an early down Inside guy. Absolute fuging 0.
  3. Swaggasaurus
    I’m usually in favor of the no trade down. It’s a different draft tho…it’s not bad, it’s just different.
  4. Swaggasaurus
    If we can’t trade back for someone to take Sanders. Give me Warren or MIKE “NO CHARGES” GREEN then.
  5. Swaggasaurus
    Walker- Has the intangibles, demeanor, and potential. Only negs are no big time #’s and size, but it’s not like he’s a hobbit. Edges out Warren for me. Position value not there.
  6. Swaggasaurus
    Of course I did. I’m talking about stats only. 60 total tackles and 6.5 sacks is nowhere near top 10 pick stats. I said I probably pick him and it’s for what’s on tape, between the ears and what he can be. But I’m quoting the one year wonder stat for Warren. And comparing it to zero year wonder from other prospects.
  7. Swaggasaurus
    Horrible argument in comparison to the potential Edge Rusher picks who have exactly 0 high level successful years statistically. Looking at you Walker, Williams, and Shemar. That said all on the table I probably go Walker over Warren, but the paper don’t look so good..
  8. Swaggasaurus
    Brock Bowers was 6’3” at the combine. Laporta as well. That’s not on the plus end of TE size. As far as what Warren brings that some haven’t. He’s prototype in nearly every box. Still I think you go the other way in the top 10, but someone gets a 10 year plus starter in all likelihood. Anyone can flat out bust, but you are having to project way less with Warren than others we’ve been talking about.
  9. Swaggasaurus
    Also a good comp. Almost put Shockey or Hockenson.
  10. Swaggasaurus
    All quite different players. Olsen had some work to do and always lacked some explosion as a player. Pitts played off the line a ton in college. Was really a jumbo slot receiver (Cough TMac Cough.) Warren’s comp coming out should be Shockey who was a solid 4 time ProBowler, but no GOAT. It’s not often you get one that belongs top half R1, but Warren is one. I’d still draft another direction I suppose.
  11. Swaggasaurus
    20-95k is quite the difference. These folks out here scouting can only afford a Corolla and Burger King 2 for 5. Ain’t no wonder so many busts get drafted.
  12. Swaggasaurus
    Linebacker rankings. Schwesinger’s continued rise the past few months was inevitable. Won’t make it out of the 30s. Stutsman a good consolation prize for those that miss on him. Knight Jr. could be a really good 3-4 plugger so maybe that’s a fit for us, not as instinctive. Late rounds I’d take a flier on Nick Martin or Cody Simon. Still think we need a piece there.
  13. Swaggasaurus
    Diggs a good player. If we miss out on getting the earlier guys, I like him a little later.
  14. Swaggasaurus
    Ok. You’re entitled to your opinion. I think he’ll be primarily a Jack they move inside on obvious passing downs to either blitz or spy. Still doesn’t put him as even a “ILB hybrid” for me, because you basically still need a two down starter at Mike or Will outside of Walker.
  15. Swaggasaurus
    He has UDFA tape for his 1/2 down plays at ILB. His run fits and instincts are atrocious. I like him as an edge and a move piece on obvious passing downs, but I can’t believe we are this far in with anybody thinking this guy is going to play any traditional inside backer for any significant snaps.
×
×
  • Create New...