-
Posts
15,029 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Growl
-
Oscar delp was just some guy some people on twitter told you that we liked and you liked hearing news in the wasteland of the offseason and talked yourself into the idea that you were looking at something relevant to you you don’t care about Oscar delp.
-
Suddenly I’m concerned
-
We’ll see how far the medical pushes McCoy down, but getting a guy like that who is a 1st rounder from a talent standpoint and can play right away with Freeling getting more of a redshirt would actually be a really nice get.
-
There’s some good nickel corners that would plug and play. We’ve got no corner depth and Mike Jackson has one season left on his contract.
-
Finally! Draft day is here. (NFL Draft Round 1 Live thread)
Growl replied to TD alt's topic in Carolina Panthers
The Panthers have made a selection, anyways, about the Cowboys…. -
I just can’t see a scenario where they adore Thieneman and don’t pick swap with Detroit. It would cost next to nothing. Detroit gets a late pick and the opportunity to screw Minnesota, while exchanging what is basically one slot down the board. There hasn’t been much projected overlap in their needs. if he goes 18 then I suspect they liked him but didn’t love him.
-
LAST MINUTE: ESPN's Matt Miller's final cock draft
Growl replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
You don’t really draft players on sex appeal, you draft available talent relative to needs, positional value, depth of position, and overall cost of acquiring players elsewhere. OT and DT don’t have a lot of names that are highly sought after, skill positions are expensive high value positions that are deep in this particular class, thus the interest. -
Draft Week Rumors, Leaks and Media Draftniks Final Mocks
Growl replied to 45catfan's topic in Carolina Panthers
this seems more like a controlled leak. An identical sentiment coming out at exactly the same time to multiple insiders? also moving up to draft someone who ideally won’t play much this season wouldn’t be normal -
BOLD TAKE: Panthers will draft Jacob Rodriguez @19
Growl replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
right, and to be clear, we all see past the attempted misdirect here. You’re embarrassed, we get it. You should be, and since you already know the point I’m going to make I’ll go ahead and make it-if you aren’t even familiar with fixture players on a team that went undefeated and won it all-why would we assume that can provide a credible opinion on players from teams who did much less? the answer is of course that you cannot. -
BOLD TAKE: Panthers will draft Jacob Rodriguez @19
Growl replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
There is no mistake I can make. You’ve demonstrated that you don’t know who multiple noteworthy players are from a natty team that are prominent names in the upcoming draft. It’s okay to admit you don’t follow along that close. -
BOLD TAKE: Panthers will draft Jacob Rodriguez @19
Growl replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
You’re embarrassing yourself dude. Sometimes it’s okay to put the shovel away and stop digging. you don’t follow ball that close, it’s okay. also are you really going to undermine your own point? if both WRs are splitting opportunities-then the playing field is even and the one with the bigger numbers would be regarded as taking that bullet point in his favor. stop being cringe -
BOLD TAKE: Panthers will draft Jacob Rodriguez @19
Growl replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
which you apparently just looked up because you were unfamiliar with him. far out produced Carnell Tate this past season, despite having to split touches with Sarratt. He’s going high. -
BOLD TAKE: Panthers will draft Jacob Rodriguez @19
Growl replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
-
BOLD TAKE: Panthers will draft Jacob Rodriguez @19
Growl replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
I doubt he’s in consideration at 19. He’s probably never going to be a great in the box player and after they just spent money on Devin Lloyd there’s a bit of redundancy. Also a deep LB class, not a premium position, etc. Anything could happen in this class but I very credibly doubt that it is this. -
General Offseason Chat/News (& AI slop postings)
Growl replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
I mean I wholly endorse taking a great OT prospect if you can get one but ultimately Taylor Moton has missed four games across the past five seasons and is still an elite RT. -
General Offseason Chat/News (& AI slop postings)
Growl replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
remember six years ago when we all thought Trent Williams was suiting up to ring chase with a contender for a couple seasons before he hung it up? remember that the next time you wanna push Taylor Moton out the door -
Draft Week Rumors, Leaks and Media Draftniks Final Mocks
Growl replied to 45catfan's topic in Carolina Panthers
I like Sadiq, I like the personality here as well. Idaho guy. I’m not sure if it’s the best selection-I actually worry that his ability as a route runner needs work. He’s mainly just winning on athleticism. But he’s terrific with the ball in his hands and it’s not often you have a piece like that you can throw the old backside screen to and reel off 20 yards. his blocking doesn’t concern me. He’s technically sound, strong. You line him up off ball in 12 and let Mitchell Evans do the dirty work while he pulls to pick up a linebacker or nosey corner. He’s plus at that on the tape (what little there is of it anyways, I miss draftbreakdown(?)) he develops as a route runner and he’ll be excellent. I just wonder if there’s a more plug and play weapon like Cooper or Concepcion or a better long term play at OT. But I like Sadiq plenty. -
How Will the Lawrence Trade Influence the Draft???
Growl replied to chknwing's topic in Carolina Panthers
You have a chance to add two top 10 players you take it. edit: especially in this class. -
He’s also substantially big than both of those guys. People can fixate on a contextless stat that appeals to their confirmation bias if they want here: when you watch a guy play and route up high end man corners-he’s going to get drafted high. ill add another stat: It was mentioned on the radio that he apparently faced the highest percentage of uncatchable balls over 15 yards in all of CFB last season. Watch him play and he consistently had to climb the ladder. Hes a good player.
-
That doesn’t really mean anything though. To expand on it, not only did they take three straight, they took a first round WR in four out of five years. if they had passed on the talent in 2007 because of what they did from 2003-2005, it would’ve been a colossal mistake. millen’s mistake was drafting bad players. If the talent is at a premium position-then take that. it should also be pointed out that today’s nfl mandates three, if not four, quality wideouts whereas in the early two thousands you were just fine with two
-
You run zone because you can’t challenge WRs in space. Developing a guy to learn when to squat or stop is a normal part of the growing process. Guys who can challenge man and separate deep are going to get drafted high or paid exuberant money. It’s a skill set you have to have on your roster. additionally, this data isn’t new-we’ve seen it before, so I don’t need to read it. It’s an isolated component of his profile whole profile, one that is about to get him drafted high.
