Jump to content

top dawg

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    28,908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by top dawg

  1. I assure you that it will not. I realize that signing Carr is a possibility, and I will have to accept it if it happens. I will just question our use of resources if we pay him top dollar for more than a year or two. I also won't be expecting us to be legitimate contenders for a Lombardi anytime soon. As for ignoring, if all you're going to do is low-key insult me, then feel free. There are others that I can have actual discussions and disagreements with while mutually respecting one another without the insults.
  2. Oh, does Reich not like Carr? Thanks for informing me.
  3. Oh how very insulting. That's classic Scot when someone points out such a silly opinion, but no worries, you can get away with your insults Scot free.
  4. Reich wasn't asked about Stroud. Stroud is a draft prospect that we might not ever get, even if we want him. Furthermore, Reich isn't going to tip his hand about any draft prospect. On the other hand, Reich was asked about Carr, a longtime veteran free agent that's out there for the taking (so to speak) and was simply asked if we would bring him in, and was noncomittal about it. The situations are totally different. What a silly comparison.
  5. So, Murray isn't very good. Murray's and Carr's career passer rating are almost identical, and the rushing yards (especially considering their years in the league) aren't even close. If Murray isn't very good, then Carr isn't either, yet you act like an undercover Carr Stan. How ironic.
  6. Well, because you obviously prefer to discuss things on such a literal if not elementary, or even boring level perhaps you'll understand this: Reich has yet to say that the Panthers are bringing in Derek Carr. He had the opportunity to, but he said that he's got other priorities at the moment. All the discussion and excitement about Carr in regards to the Panthers' interest might even be considered premature.
  7. Some of us already know what the deal is, and that's fine. I can play your game nicely.
  8. The wise man knows how to discriminate between the shades of gray. But you obviously don't do that. Or, perhaps you do when it suits your narrative. I call that manipulation.
  9. You're right. I absolutely have to be smarter. Otherwise he'll get away Scot free with slickly talking down to people, as is customary, and I'll be banned.
  10. Yeah, there's no such thing as coach-speak. And human nature is a myth as well. I'm sure that you believe everything as literal that comes out of Reich's mouth--hell everyone's mouth. There's no meaning behind anything at anytime, huh? You take everything at face value, huh? The fact that Carr could be signed while we're still evaluating effectively means nothing. It's all just black and white. The world according to Scot.
  11. To you it doesn't. I've already heard a couple of people, including Chris Canty say otherwise.
  12. If he gets 45 mil per season, the Giants will be the only one to pay it. They could try the nonexclusive tag. As for Carr, I don't know; Jones is young and has already done something Carr never has: win a playoff game. Carr is also 1-9 in games where it's 45 degrees or lower at kickoff. I don't think that the Packers will trade A-Rod to an NFC team, or at least that's a prevailing notion.
  13. Both things can be right. Is that not allowed in Scot's world?
  14. I'd be surprised if it happens at this point, but it's still a possibility. https://athlonsports.com/nfl/panthers-coach-frank-reich-addresses-the-derek-carr-speculation I'm thinking that it's a thing where you strike while the iron is hot, but Reich is being noncommittal. I mean, you really can't argue with his reasoning, but I think that if Carr was valued more highly, then we'd be acting with a little more urgency.
  15. He gets above his breeches sometimes, and when he does it with me, I just can't help but bring him down a peg or two. It happened a few years back also. He was tag teaming me, but now his old partner in crime doesn't like him.
  16. Yeah, I got personal AFTER you got personal. I just do it more in-your-face than you do. You started the whole thing just because I said that smart teams are going to wait to sign Carr. But you don't remember that. How fuging convenient. It just goes to show that you're not "right," like my grandmother says. I will give @LinvilleGorgecredit. He was being a d*ck the other day, but he apologized for it. That was cool. You? You just amped it up.
  17. You started the bullshit with me, remember! You're not going to throw your little insult at me without getting it back.
  18. That's rich. You try and twist my words around---yeah lie---and got to nerve to say I'm personally attacking you after I call you on it.
  19. By whom? Are you lying once again, Scot?
  20. Well, I think you need one. The Carr watch thread is prime evidence.
  21. Moreover, just because I have the intellect to get back at your not-so-clever schemes to manipulate doesn't mean I'm popping a blood vessel. I'm just popping the bubbles of hot air arising from your innards.
  22. You can try and manipulate my words if you like. It's not about my words, but it's about either your lying spirit, or your lack of understanding (or your feigning of a lack of understanding), basically your dumbassery.
×
×
  • Create New...