top dawg

Who is the best current boxer from what used to be part of the Soviet Union? Give me the correct answer, and you get a thumbs up from Top Dawg.

Here is Sparky151's take (LOL) from PFT's message board on the matter: sparky151 says:Feb 11, 2015 10:38 AM Hardy will tell the league he doesn’t have a copy, that it’s in his attorney’s hands. The attorney will then explain that it was created by his transcriptionist as part of the case and is his work product and privileged, just as much as what an investigator he hired might have found or what Hardy told the attorney in confidence. The league can try to suspend Hardy for that but the NFLPA would pretty easily win a grievance over the matter since it hasn’t been collectively bargained. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/02/11/nfl-will-review-court-file-as-part-of-hardy-investigation/ Now of course I don't know, but this guy sounds like he has some legal experience. Regardless, it sounds very possible.

It can't be the short form version. It must be the long form.

fify

If Lola, I will pay for the use of your credentials for an hour.

Now watch some idiot change their name to this. Or create an alt.

As s mod, Montsta's first duty should be to ban everyone that spelled his name without the tee. Oh, wait, the OP!

If it were up to me, I would make you a mod because you seem to sincerely care and desire to be one. I really would. That being said, I think that you are taking this way too seriously. You can still post and contribute, and make your impact without a title. In a way, we are all moderators (or at least we should be). You can use your personality and words to steer content in certain directions. You can earn the respect of others and make your imprint the old fashioned way, by being good at what you do. If someone gets out of line, you can use eloquence and directness to check them, which, in a way, is more effective than banning them because you can lead them into the trap of stupidity of their own making. Sure, you can't ban people, set policy, or make rules officially or de facto, but ultimately this is Jeremy Igo's little kingdom, and he is the real authority. He runs the joint with volunteers that work for free---whose only real payment is the ultimately meaningless power to clean up the forum of unnecessary, redundant or illegal content, warn members when they are getting out of line, and ban idiots. Enjoy the freedom of participation and persuasion, and the reputation and the de facto power and respect of your own making, without the burden.

Are you wholely or halfway serious, or is this just a ruse?

That's because Panthers fans are probably the only ones that really give a poo to do more than just a cursory look and wilt under ignorant public sentiment. That, or we're being homers. If much of the general population (pun intended) maligns a good guy like Cam Newton unfairly, what do you think they are going to do to a perceived bad guy like Greg Hardy? And don't throw in all the other racial factors and stereotypes regarding Hardy and Holder. Hardy's bad decisions have left him in a pickle.

Are you dominate?

And miss all the fun? I am sure it was epic.

I hit your quote by mistake. I know you're not Dexterity. I obviously need to go back to sleep.

I know. I don't know why I quoted Dex. It's easy to make mistakes with the app.

I guess I can unblock him now. In my opinion, should have been done a long time ago. The unnecessary havoc he caused started well before today. Good riddance.

Ladypanther should have been a mod a long time ago.

You've got the job (in my book)!

Greater than "I've never been banned!" Have you killed a girl?

I am still trying to figure out this "never been banned" thing, like that's a good thing.

That's exactly what I thought when Mr. Scot said that. The NFL (and to a lesser extent, the NFLPA) have bestowed God-like powers to Roger Goodell, but the league's FO still has to answer to the courts---and the court of public opinion---if Demaurice Smith decides to take legal action if necessary. On an off note, if Hardy gets a two game suspension, I think that he will probably let the whole thing go and do his time, especially if there is some tacit agreement by the Panthers that this would be palatable to them in regards to re-signing him on a one year prove-it deal.

I gotta think that G-man was using Ginn as a real receiver because that is what the cap permitted at the time. Both G-man and especially Rivera have talked up the fact that there may be a change in thinking regarding having special teams aces. I would think that Ginn would fit this bill. History has pretty much proven that this is the most efficient way to use Ginn. Ace, first and foremost. Receiver, occasionally.

The more, the merrier...at the right price. I am no GM, but I could see paying him five mil over the next three seasons with three guaranteed.

All that Voth or any blogger ever had to say is that chances are that Hardy will not be back, but there is a small chance that he could return under the right circumstances. I believe one Charlotte writer did (though I can't remember who it was). Talking with surety before the dust settles makes for unnecessary drama, but also makes for good traffic I suppose.

He had a bench trial in which the female judge found him guilty based on some sketchy circumstances. He appealed so that he could be judged by a jury of his peers. This jury trial never happened because the state did not believe that it could not make a credible case due to the alleged victim being uncooperative.

Hardy is going to get railroaded regardless of the facts. He may have been better off just going to a jury trial. He is in the center of the perfect storm, and Roger and his new female cohorts will probably succumb to public pressure.