DaveThePanther2008

In the court of public opinion. So you're ok with the fact that at defense will not give a list of the women accusing him. I

None of the shyt she said was true. All fabricated.

Exactly!!!! Kavanaugh was able to defend himself and knew his accuser. They were able to show that her story was fabricated. The difference between Kavanaugh and Watson is that these women are hiding behind a lawyer that wants him convicted before there ever is a trial. Reveal the names and let the defense and do their background check. It's appalling that so many on here are ready to convict just because there are several women making the accusation. Once again, I am not saying he is innocent but I am saying they need to allow his lawyers do their due diligence and investigate their backgrounds and come to the truth.

You can't believe either side. You have to let the facts make the case. I am not going to believe a woman who is afraid to reveal her name even in confidentiality to the man you are accusing. @Snake Let me ask you this. If a woman came in here and said you sexually assaulted her. Are we supposed to ban you until you are proven innocent or are we supposed to get the facts and make a decision after all the facts are in. We can't as a society just assume that because a woman or women come out and make a claim against a person. The case must unfold and both sides need to investigate a prove their case. I don't know whether he did it or not. What I find extremely unfair is that so many women came out in 2+ weeks and not a one of them has given their name. To me they are hiding something.

IMO this is the No 1. reason why the names are being withheld. It will be interesting to see how many of these women have had sex with their customers or offered a "Happy Ending" to their massage. Also this would give a valid reason why there were so many? While I am certain that many women are professional and keep their sexual life out of their profession. There are many that use the job title as a way to lure men to pay for the additional service. Please don't tell me they don't exist because I have experienced the offer from this profession. I won't divulge in whether I accepted or not.

Yes I agree. His takes were very unbiased and explained it well. Especially how he explained the difference between Mahomes arm and Wilson's arm. If it is Fields that drops to us we need to be certain we aren't getting, as I stated before, Colin Kaepernick 2.0.

I'd be supportive too because Fitterer and Rhule have determined that he will perform.

I agree. If there is video evidence than Watson is sunk. However with as many women coming out and saying he was perfectly fine. It is going to come down to proof. I posted a link about the Houston Police which makes this very interesting. I read it the other day that the lawyer in this suit does not want Houston Police investigating. I don't know what their rift is between the lawyer and the police chief. I read where the lawyer wanted an independent investigator.

Probably as much as the Texans paid off those women claiming wrongdoing just to get back at Watson for wanting to leave Houston.

You know I think that the defense has been finding these women who say he's been clean. This will come down to who do you believe unless they come up with physical evidence. What really bothers me is that the defense will not provide a list of the name of these women. It's hard to defend yourself when you don't know your accuser. I thought one of our legal requirements is that you must be able to face your accuser. I think if the defense ever gets a list of these women they will attempt to find out if some of these women have preformed "Happy Endings" for other customers. This IMO is why the defense will not give those names out.

I think we'll end up with one of the top five QBs. Its seems the question marks that some teams may have will drop one or two of these QBs to us. Not saying I wouldn't take Fields at 8 if he were available but this is the second time I have heard about Fields ability to go through his progression. We don't need a Colin Kaepernick on steroids.

This is interesting as the lawyer for the plantiffs do not want the Houston Police department investigating this because of some riff between the lawyer and the police chief. They wanted an independent investigation. https://www.khou.com/article/news/local/deshaun-watson-rusty-hardin-tony-buzbee-lawsuits/285-4cfd4fc4-8014-450f-a889-07711242a992

The cost to trade up for Fields would be enormous and he has his question marks.

The word is that this is a deep draft for OT. I would like to have a solid center and Humphrey is a solid choice. But if we took a OT and Center I would be happy too.

Twelve position groups a total of 60 players. https://www.nfl.com/news/bucky-brooks-top-five-2021-nfl-draft-prospects-by-position-2-0 Assuming all 60 of the top players went in the first two rounds. We have a shot at 2 of them. Who do you choose. If we get one of the QBs I want Lance. If not, Surtain. 2nd Round Creed Humphrey

I think any move for Darnold will be made after the draft. If we land a QB than we won't pursue Darnold.

I did. I imagine George with the stoggie while he sings. I think they love Lawrence and Wilson. The are probably meh on the others.

The days of keeping all your drafts picks is becoming a nightmare. When teams start paying skilled a good portion of the cap they are ruining the team concept. I think unless you have a very creative GM, you'll lose your young talent. For us, CMC and soon DJ and followed by Burn, Chinn and others. You just can't pay top dollar for all these players and still fill an adequate roster. I think in today's league Rounds 1 thru 4 are critical to maintaining success. Keeping on the super core players.

Not that she didn't go out but she was only a sophomore and only 20 at the time.

I'll take the Riot Report draft over the Observer. I can see us trading back. We would be able to address the O-Line with those new picks or maybe combine one of them and move up get a 2nd, 2nd round pick and get an OT.

True in every case but the point of the post is that unless we have a franchise QB like all the players you mentioned which would you prefer?

I get your point but not necessarily. Game Managers only throw to open targets. They don't give the WR the chance to fight for the ball, gunslingers do. DJ especially would be one of those WR that would fight a DB for the ball. Those plays are explosive plays something we sorely miss.

My post was meant mostly for a non-franchise type QB. Brees, Rodgers and Brady (to name a few) are franchise QBs that do both. Our chances of getting one of these players this year is quite slim. Which is why I asked Gunslinger or Game Manager

2019 Almost 62% completion with a 19 - 13 TD to Int. All he had was Anderson. He'd come in already familiar with Anderson which would help him immensely. Plus you have CMC and DJ. I am sure he would out play any year he had in NYJ.

Curtis Samuel was our go to guy on third down. Watching this video makes me think he could fill that roll that Samuel thrived on. Moore and Anderson going deep and Simon catching the underneath routes. He's not as fast as Curtis but could fill that role. Could being the key word.